Support Requests - CLICK TO READ BEFORE POSTING



Posted by: cptncc1701d
09-24-2016, 03:33 PM
Forum: Sound
- Replies (7)

Hi Folks,

I just installed to Linux Lite 3.0 on my old Dell PC and all seems to be working except I do not hear any sound. I know that the sound card/speakers were working before the install so I don't think it is a hardware issue.

I am not a Linux expert and so my "limited" troubleshooting hasn't resolved the issue. Can someone please give me some information on how I should proceed?

I did go into Multimedia Volume Control and I see that it shows I am not muted but it does say in the Output Devices tab that the PORT Line Out (unplugged)

Here are the System Report details ...

Code:
=========================================================== Bios & Motherboard Information =========================================================== BIOS: # dmidecode 3.0 Getting SMBIOS data from sysfs. SMBIOS 2.3 present. Handle 0x0000, DMI type 0, 24 bytes BIOS Information   Vendor: Dell Inc.                  Version: 1.4.1   Release Date: 05/07/2007   Address: 0xF0000   Runtime Size: 64 kB   ROM Size: 512 kB   Characteristics:       PCI is supported       PNP is supported       APM is supported       BIOS is upgradeable       BIOS shadowing is allowed       Boot from CD is supported       Selectable boot is supported       EDD is supported       Japanese floppy for Toshiba 1.2 MB is supported (int 13h)       Print screen service is supported (int 5h)       8042 keyboard services are supported (int 9h)       Serial services are supported (int 14h)       Printer services are supported (int 17h)       ACPI is supported       USB legacy is supported       LS-120 boot is supported       BIOS boot specification is supported       Function key-initiated network boot is supported       Targeted content distribution is supported   BIOS Revision: 1.4 MOTHERBOARD: # dmidecode 3.0 Getting SMBIOS data from sysfs. SMBIOS 2.3 present. Handle 0x0200, DMI type 2, 8 bytes Base Board Information   Manufacturer: Dell Inc.            Product Name: 0YF432   Version: A02   Serial Number: ..CN137406BB00EK. # dmidecode 3.0 Getting SMBIOS data from sysfs. SMBIOS 2.3 present. Handle 0x0300, DMI type 3, 13 bytes Chassis Information   Manufacturer: Dell Inc.                  Type: Tower   Lock: Not Present   Version: Not Specified   Serial Number: 8GC79C1   Asset Tag:            Boot-up State: Safe   Power Supply State: Safe   Thermal State: Safe   Security Status: None =========================================================== CPU Information =========================================================== model name  : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU          6600  @ 2.40GHz model name  : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU          6600  @ 2.40GHz Architecture:          i686 CPU op-mode(s):        32-bit, 64-bit Byte Order:            Little Endian CPU(s):                2 On-line CPU(s) list:  0,1 Thread(s) per core:    1 Core(s) per socket:    2 Socket(s):            1 Vendor ID:            GenuineIntel CPU family:            6 Model:                15 Model name:            Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU          6600  @ 2.40GHz Stepping:              6 CPU MHz:              2394.237 BogoMIPS:              4788.47 Virtualization:        VT-x L1d cache:            32K L1i cache:            32K L2 cache:              4096K Flags:                fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm lahf_lm tpr_shadow dtherm =========================================================== Memory Information =========================================================== RAM SPEED:   Speed: 667 MHz   Speed: 667 MHz   Speed: 667 MHz   Speed: 667 MHz PHYSICAL RAM DETAILS (one section per ram slot): # dmidecode 3.0 Getting SMBIOS data from sysfs. SMBIOS 2.3 present. Handle 0x1100, DMI type 17, 27 bytes Memory Device   Array Handle: 0x1000   Error Information Handle: Not Provided   Total Width: 64 bits   Data Width: 64 bits   Size: 1024 MB   Form Factor: DIMM   Set: None   Locator: DIMM_1   Bank Locator: Not Specified   Type: DDR   Type Detail: Synchronous   Speed: 667 MHz   Manufacturer: 7F7F7F7F7F510000   Serial Number: 04073610   Asset Tag: 440650   Part Number: 64T128020HU3SB    Handle 0x1101, DMI type 17, 27 bytes Memory Device   Array Handle: 0x1000   Error Information Handle: Not Provided   Total Width: 64 bits   Data Width: 64 bits   Size: No Module Installed   Form Factor: DIMM   Set: None   Locator: DIMM_3   Bank Locator: Not Specified   Type: DDR   Type Detail: Synchronous   Speed: 667 MHz   Manufacturer: FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF   Serial Number: FFFFFFFF   Asset Tag: FFFFFF   Part Number:                  Handle 0x1102, DMI type 17, 27 bytes Memory Device   Array Handle: 0x1000   Error Information Handle: Not Provided   Total Width: 64 bits   Data Width: 64 bits   Size: 1024 MB   Form Factor: DIMM   Set: None   Locator: DIMM_2   Bank Locator: Not Specified   Type: DDR   Type Detail: Synchronous   Speed: 667 MHz   Manufacturer: 7F7F7F7F7F510000   Serial Number: 04073517   Asset Tag: 440650   Part Number: 64T128020HU3SB    Handle 0x1103, DMI type 17, 27 bytes Memory Device   Array Handle: 0x1000   Error Information Handle: Not Provided   Total Width: 64 bits   Data Width: 64 bits   Size: No Module Installed   Form Factor: DIMM   Set: None   Locator: DIMM_4   Bank Locator: Not Specified   Type: DDR   Type Detail: Synchronous   Speed: 667 MHz   Manufacturer: FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF   Serial Number: FFFFFFFF   Asset Tag: FFFFFF   Part Number:                  =========================================================== Graphics Chip Information ===========================================================   *-display       description: VGA compatible controller       product: G92 [GeForce 9800 GT]       vendor: NVIDIA Corporation       physical id: 0       bus info: pci@0000:01:00.0       version: a2       width: 64 bits       clock: 33MHz       capabilities: pm msi pciexpress vga_controller bus_master cap_list rom       configuration: driver=nouveau latency=0       resources: irq:29 memory:de000000-deffffff memory:c0000000-cfffffff memory:dc000000-ddffffff ioport:dc80(size=128) memory:dbf00000-dbf1ffff =========================================================== Sound Information =========================================================== **** List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices **** card 0: NVidia [HDA NVidia], device 0: STAC9227 Analog [STAC9227 Analog]   Subdevices: 0/1   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 =========================================================== Hard Drive/SSD Information =========================================================== Filesystem    Type    1K-blocks    Used Available Use% Mounted on udev          devtmpfs  1010824      0  1010824  0% /dev tmpfs          tmpfs      205972    6556    199416  4% /run /dev/sda1      ext4    238115464 5060944 220935892  3% / tmpfs          tmpfs      1029856  158264    871592  16% /dev/shm tmpfs          tmpfs        5120      4      5116  1% /run/lock tmpfs          tmpfs      1029856      0  1029856  0% /sys/fs/cgroup cgmfs          tmpfs          100      0      100  0% /run/cgmanager/fs tmpfs          tmpfs      205972      36    205936  1% /run/user/1000



Posted by: erve02d0
09-24-2016, 02:29 PM
Forum: Installing Software
- Replies (5)

I use a number of .jar programs for development - drjava, mars, logisim - and I would like those programs to be launched when I open source files. For example, .asm files are currently opened in Text editor instead of mars, so I have to launch .asm from within mars. So, how do I change the defaults? Also, why isn't this taken care of automatically, like in Windows?



Posted by: gorin002
09-23-2016, 05:35 PM
Forum: On Topic
- No Replies

how i did don t know but its working
its bit slow .working fine



Posted by: trinidad
09-23-2016, 05:05 PM
Forum: On Topic
- Replies (2)

          These comments are intended for new users, and Windows converts. In general the vast majority of computer users are GUI users, and many are quite adept with getting things to work together. In the case of systemd and XFCE this is not always good praxis. XFCE is a wonderfully powerful but simple Linux desktop. Systemd though it has its detractors, is also a very powerful Debian management tool, aimed at future development. XFCE is good Linux. Systemd is good Linux. Combining two good Linux things does not always make a better Linux. Vinegar is good for making salads. Baking soda is good for making biscuits. Mix vinegar and baking soda together and all you get is a fire extinguisher.
          Many things like autostart, and root permissions in XFCE Debian do not always blend well with systemd, not because either Linux is a bad Linux, but because both are good Linux, good Linux for what they are designed for. Often this means some applications configured to run out of the box with systemd need to be changed to work well with XFCE, and vice versa. Some of them such as Thunar with root permissions, drop box, and others, are configured into whatever operating system permissions are involved, for instance Debian running XFCE, or Debian Jessie default. When you change things from the terminal to increase functionality often the changes will succeed at first, but either not persist through reboots, as is the case for remotely using versions of Thunar open as root file manager in Debian where root Thunar is persistent through the session, or not display proper desktop functionality as is the case for drop box, or not persist at all except for the root permissions which will from XFCE in Debian force repeated reboots usually once for every file deleted or moved remotely with Thunar root, because root login is not possible from Debian (systemd), and the saved actions have to be reconciled one at a time before XFCE in Debian will allow normal login again. There are many reasons why Debian does not ship with XFCE as the default desktop, and nearly all of them are because some applications designed to be compatible with XFCE in Debian cause problems with systemd configurations for Debian. Neither Linux is bad Linux.
          Finally, as Debian continues along its path of hardening its systemd, conflicts are going to be discovered by users concerning applications hardened to XFCE Ubuntu based distros. By sheer numbers of users, Ubuntu, and Ubuntu based distro users are probably the greater number, and probably at least half of that number use XFCE. This does not mean XFCE is the better more secure system, or the better Linux. It just means, it takes all kinds to make a world, even in the Linux world. The systemd ball is in Ubuntu's court concerning XFCE, and rightfully so. Debian is committed to systemd and gnome at least partially for Ubuntu development's sake, but it is also in the XFCE developers' court as far as continuing with a desktop version for Ubuntu.  If you don't understand the differences in the system topology between Debian systemd and Ubuntu based distros running XFCE, it's best not to tinker too much with systemd on your Linux Lite system. It is here to stay, but XFCE and Ubuntu may or may not always play well together in the future, and I don't know if that situation is going to change or not. Ubuntu certainly has growing pains in some areas, and XFCE has resource shortage pangs. Who knows.

TC



Posted by: Sebouh
09-23-2016, 09:41 AM
Forum: Introductions
- Replies (4)

Hello Linux Lite Team and Forum Members  Smile
I am glad to be onboard  Smile
Cheers,
Sebouh



Posted by: tomt
09-22-2016, 11:25 PM
Forum: Security & Bug Fixes
- Replies (9)

By now I am sure all of you heard, in case you haven`t here is the story. I closed mine years ago.

http://news.sky.com/story/500-million-ya...n-10588865



Posted by: Dana Marsee
09-22-2016, 05:36 PM
Forum: Off Topic
- Replies (10)

I am looking for a new Linux Laptop.  Can anybody recommend a good one under $300...and it has to be available at Amazon, because I'm gonna have to get it on my Amazon card.  Smile  Thanks. ;D



Posted by: newtusmaximus
09-22-2016, 10:45 AM
Forum: Off Topic
- Replies (9)

With Ubuntu considering dropping 32bit, is it time for the LL developers to look at switching from the Ubuntu base to "straight" debian?  I have just started experimenting with Point Linux (XCFE 32 bit) on my Fuji Si1520 (2006) whose processor will not run 64bit OS but has  plenty of life left in it.  So far so good, no keyboard issues on set up  , wifi found automatically etc. 

Question therefore , is switching  "bases"  an option preserve the availability of LL to older machines beyond the Ubuntu  32 bit switch off?



Posted by: Jocklad
09-22-2016, 08:08 AM
Forum: Off Topic
- Replies (5)

Just came across this.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-37431299

Jocklad



Posted by: torreydale
09-21-2016, 03:58 PM
Forum: Suggestions and Feedback
- Replies (2)

I know this YouTuber prefers MATE, but if you can endure his frustrated tone, there are some decent suggestions here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tP7E90EPEaU