| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Forum Statistics |
» Members: 7,727
» Latest member: Samuelo
» Forum threads: 9,424
» Forum posts: 62,197
Full Statistics
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 1183 online users.
» 0 Member(s) | 1179 Guest(s)
Applebot, Baidu, Bing, Google
|
| Latest Threads |
Sem som quando reinicia
Forum: Other
Last Post: di0lh0
2 hours ago
» Replies: 16
» Views: 199
|
after install Linux Lite ...
Forum: Installing Linux Lite
Last Post: stevef
7 hours ago
» Replies: 9
» Views: 163
|
Problem updating lite 7.6...
Forum: Updates
Last Post: valtam
11-13-2025, 11:52 PM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 361
|
ASUS x206HA black screen ...
Forum: Installing Linux Lite
Last Post: Doceal
11-10-2025, 09:25 AM
» Replies: 6
» Views: 859
|
time synchronization
Forum: Other
Last Post: LL-user
11-09-2025, 12:18 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 186
|
Series to Series Upgrade ...
Forum: Linux Lite Software Development
Last Post: berrywhitetiger
11-07-2025, 05:43 AM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 4,216
|
Regarding the minimum sys...
Forum: Installing Linux Lite
Last Post: valtam
11-02-2025, 11:41 PM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 431
|
Can't test LinuxLite 7.6 ...
Forum: Installing Linux Lite
Last Post: valtam
11-02-2025, 05:51 AM
» Replies: 23
» Views: 7,343
|
My worries
Forum: Installing Linux Lite
Last Post: stevef
11-01-2025, 03:44 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 242
|
nstall Updates - Could n...
Forum: Updates
Last Post: stevef
10-30-2025, 10:21 PM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 517
|
|
|
| Updates failure Series 3.x Wine NO_PUBKEY 76F1A20FF987672F error FIX |
|
Posted by: valtam - 02-18-2019, 01:54 AM - Forum: Updates
- Replies (2)
|
 |
If your getting the following error message during updates in 3.x:
Code: W: An error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error: https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/ubuntu xenial InRelease: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 76F1A20FF987672F
W: Failed to fetch https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/ubuntu/dists/xenial/InRelease The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 76F1A20FF987672F
W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
Fix with the following:
Code: wget -nc https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/winehq.key && sudo apt-key add winehq.key && sudo apt update
Then run Install Updates again.
|
|
|
| looking for a new Printer/scanner , i need a list, i am on a budget, please help |
|
Posted by: kissbaby3 - 02-18-2019, 01:37 AM - Forum: Printing and Scanning
- Replies (2)
|
 |
tax time around the corner, looking for a new printer, scanner(all in one).
that uses separate cartridges, black cartridge, one cartridge for each color cartridge.
total number of cartridges "4".
why ?, because if you run out of one of the 3 colors that are in one cartridge , it becomes a head ache.
my budget $$$ ,is 100.00 dollars or less, plus i hoe the cartridges are refillable , i actually done that before, in years past.
i am using linux lite 4.2.
i say thanks to every one who replies , hugs.
|
|
|
|
| File associations with Wine programs |
|
Posted by: timbuck2 - 02-17-2019, 03:27 AM - Forum: Other
- Replies (13)
|
 |
Hello, I have two type of files XEX and HYP that use two different Wine programs.
But when I try to open a HYP it uses the program for XEX.
If I change the file association to the program for HYP, then the XEX tries to use that program so it is a loop.
Is this a wine issue or linux lite issue? How can I straighten this out?
|
|
|
|
| LL4.2 load time (5min+ No V Box) is 16 times longer than LL3.8 -ToshibaSatellite |
|
Posted by: Yardvark - 02-17-2019, 01:03 AM - Forum: Installing Linux Lite
- Replies (11)
|
 |
LL4.2 load time (5min+ No V Box) is 16 times longer than LL3.8
I have attached a page showing errors that appear during loading.
I am another Linux Newbie, and loved LL3.8. Unfortunately, LL4.x to date is a great disappointment.
On an SSD I have to wait 16 times as long for LL4.x to load as LL3.8 as timed from GRUB to Desktop.
Virtual Box services have been removed as recommended and no longer, show in systemd-analyze blame.
I own a Toshiba Satellite A200-06V made around 2007. Vista era.
CPU=Intel Core2Duo T5250 @1.5GHz, I have upgraded from HDD to SSD and RAM from 1GB to 4GB.
Storage device load times > (NOTE: LL4.2 has V Box services removed)
HDD SSD
LL3.8 0 min. 54sec. 0 min. 18sec. (SSD takes 33% of time of HDD)
LL4.2 334sec. (5min.34sec.) 293sec. (4min.53sec.) (SSD takes 88% of time of HDD)
With LL4 the HDD/SSD activity light shows remarkably little activity – mostly none at all.
I then tried an installation of LL4.x on a Dell Vostro_1400 (2x Intel Core2 Duo CPU T7250 @ 2.00GHz). The results were similar to those above.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Finally I installed LL4.2 in an HP Pavilion dv6500 (dv6627ca) laptop with dreamed of results - Fabulous.
This has an AMD chipset. CPU=AMD Turion 64x2 TL-58 @ 1.9GHz, RAM=2GB
The HDD activity light was very busy. Load times from grub to desktop were:
Storage device load times > (NOTE: LL4.2 has V Box services removed)
HDD SSD
LL3.8 68 sec. 18 sec.
LL4.2 76 sec. 21sec (Not the 293 sec. 4m:53sec with the Toshiba\Intel chipset)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
LL4.x runs beautifully on both computers once it has loaded but who will wait 5+ min. for the OS to load.
Last September I visited a local Linux Community group. Three Linux sages concluded that it was a Kernel problem vis-à-vis my Intel chipset and that my problem would probably be resolved with updates before very long. I have updated the Kernel from 4.15.0-24-generic #26-Ubuntu to 4.16.0 to 4.17.0 to 4.20.0 (Lite Tweaks) with no noticeable improvement in load time.
I know this problem is not unique but I have not found an answer to my problem in this Forum.
I tried this below as best as I could. Neither 1 nor 2 made any difference.
https://askubuntu.com/questions/893817/b...per-errors
Advice on this subject would be much appreciated, as I would dearly love to be able to use LL4.x
Thanks In anticipation.
Yardvark
See Attachment: LL4.2-Toshiba loading errors.txt
|
|
|
|
| Is it possible to resize root partition? |
|
Posted by: Nyto - 02-16-2019, 11:35 PM - Forum: Hard Drives and SSDs
- Replies (4)
|
 |
[size=78%].[/size]
Hello.
My system is working properly, it is a LL 4.2 installation, and the partitioning is:
Device Description
------------- --------------------------
/dev/sda1 Boot, Ext4
/dev/sda2 Root, Ext4
/dev/sda3 Home, Ext4
/dev/sda4 Misc_storage, NTFS
I need to resize my root partition, but I guess it can't be done on a running system.
I know it could be resized by booting from a Live USB drive, but won't this mess up my installation, preventing it from boot?
I don't want to change the partitioning, I just need to allocate more space for said partition. Additional space is available on the same drive.
Can you guys recommend what to do?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
| dual boot question |
|
Posted by: Trudyg - 02-16-2019, 04:20 PM - Forum: Installing Linux Lite
- Replies (11)
|
|
I just installed LL 4.0 and followed the instructions to dual boot alongside Windows 7. The install went great, but how do I get to windows now? I don't see it anywhere. Did I overwrite it and now it's gone? That wouldn't be the end of the world, I just want to know if I should try harder to figure it out or just accept that windows is gone.
|
|
|
|
| Manually editing the menu how? |
|
Posted by: Abw - 02-16-2019, 12:01 AM - Forum: Desktop Customization
- Replies (1)
|
|
Hi, I've got three Menu items that do not point to any program and I can not get rid of them. These items do not show in the menu editor. Is there a way to manually edit the menu and delete residual entries? If so, a detailed step by step would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
| install question |
|
Posted by: Trudyg - 02-15-2019, 05:59 PM - Forum: Installing Linux Lite
- Replies (1)
|
|
I'm at the point where you pick the ntfs drive and the manual says sda3. I don't know what to choose. I have 2 that say windows 7 recovery, one that says fat 32 and one that has the right space but says unusable. Checking it causes the change button to fade so I can't press it. What do I choose? Thanks.
ETA: can I just shoose the FAT 32 drive and use that for my LL?
|
|
|
|
|
