0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
you guys blocked each other
No I am not your servant , you test it if you wish to.
Quote from: bitsnpcs on May 16, 2018, 05:37:22 AMAfter installing Sound Juicer it ripped it easily, quickly, with zero errors, and produced a good rip 1+hour duration, audio wise. Besides soundjuicer, try ripperx, ripoff and asunder, too.sudo apt install ripperx ripoff asunder -yTest them all and then choose the best. Maybe you will leave a message then about your impressions of them for other users? If I am not mistaken, Asunder is included in MX-Linux.
After installing Sound Juicer it ripped it easily, quickly, with zero errors, and produced a good rip 1+hour duration, audio wise.
Quick question and maybe suggestion for you guys, I don't have my LiLi to test at the moment but is Chromium in Lite Software beacause it's PPA only, etc.?If it's available in the "official" channels, I would suggest maybe checking if it could be a contender to replace FireFox.
I Like FF but and I may be wrong but I did a few personnal tests and the new-ish engine in FireFox now seam to use more memory than Chromium, even if advertised otherwise. And the browser seems "heavy" on lower end machines(?). I didn't check the exact download file size but seams about the same.
and for a beginner who has just migrated from Windows to Linux the last is similar to Chinese (I remember my first impression of Linux)
Feel free to hang on to your suggestions for 4.2 when I start that thread.
It would be utterly counter-intuitive to remove whoopsie and apport from a distro designed for new Linux users coming directly from MS. None of them are running LL headless servers, and generally they are inexperienced with Linux. The chances of an inexperienced user unwittingly breaking a new system over time would increase dramatically without whoopsie and apport.