Forum Home
Help
Bugs
Search
Bookmarks
Download
Donate
Shop
Staff
Login
Register
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
You are Here:
Linux Lite Forums
»
General
»
Suggestions and Feedback
»
Linux Lite 1.8 vs 2.0 Performance
Linux Lite 7.0 RC1 Released - See Release Announcement Section
Linux Lite 1.8 vs 2.0 Performance
« previous
next »
Send this topic
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
(Read 4102 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Re: Linux Lite 1.8 vs 2.0 Performance
«
Reply #7 on:
July 08, 2014, 04:09:16 PM »
Wirezfree
PayPal Supporter
Platinum Level Poster
1484
Posts
Reputation: 405
Linux Lite "Advocate"
CPU: i7-4790S
MEMORY: 16Gb
VIDEO CARD: Intel HD4600 (Integrated)
Hi,
Thanks...
I have seen reference to it, but not tried it yet.
I have spent the past 3+ hours researching Evolution email and how
to connect that to Hosted Exchange with EWS(Exchange Web Services).
Looks quite promising, it's almost a clone of MS Outlook.
But Evolution could bloat LL2
73 DE G8LIY
Dave
Logged
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8
- (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks
Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) , BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
Re: Linux Lite 1.8 vs 2.0 Performance
«
Reply #6 on:
July 08, 2014, 03:50:29 PM »
N4RPS
Donator
Platinum Level Poster
1149
Posts
Reputation: 155
Knows JUST ENOUGH Linux to be DANGEROUS
CPU: Several Different 32-bit & 64-bit CPUs, 2-8 GB RAM
MEMORY: 8Gb
VIDEO CARD: Several Different AMD and Intel GPUs
Hello!
Have you tried Dia as a replacement for Visio?
73 DE N4RPS
Rob
Logged
A gun in your hand is worth more than a whole police force on the phone.
Re: Linux Lite 1.8 vs 2.0 Performance
«
Reply #5 on:
July 08, 2014, 06:25:27 AM »
Wirezfree
PayPal Supporter
Platinum Level Poster
1484
Posts
Reputation: 405
Linux Lite "Advocate"
CPU: i7-4790S
MEMORY: 16Gb
VIDEO CARD: Intel HD4600 (Integrated)
Hi Valtam,
I would give LL2 10 out 10.
I do have a couple of things to address, I use Virtualbox/Windows for that.
> Finding a replacement for MS Visio for diagrams & flow charts
> An email client that works with my Hosted MS Exchange provider,
not even Evolution, it's to do with http/rpc connect method.
David
Logged
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8
- (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks
Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) , BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
Re: Linux Lite 1.8 vs 2.0 Performance
«
Reply #4 on:
July 07, 2014, 06:22:50 PM »
Jerry
Linux Lite Creator
Administrator
Platinum Level Poster
8785
Posts
Reputation: 803
Linux Lite Member
CPU: Intel Core i9-10850K CPU @ 3.60GHz
MEMORY: 32Gb
VIDEO CARD: nVidia GeForce GTX 1650
Kernel: 5.x
Cool
Logged
Download your free copy of Linux Lite today.
Jerry Bezencon
Linux Lite Creator
It wants no straps.
Re: Linux Lite 1.8 vs 2.0 Performance
«
Reply #3 on:
July 07, 2014, 04:06:59 PM »
Wirezfree
PayPal Supporter
Platinum Level Poster
1484
Posts
Reputation: 405
Linux Lite "Advocate"
CPU: i7-4790S
MEMORY: 16Gb
VIDEO CARD: Intel HD4600 (Integrated)
Hi Valtam,
Very Nice sauce
keep it coming.
I did forgot to add...
I have updated the Intel Microcode:
Available in Synaptic Package Manager.
Installed latest Intel "Linux" Graphics drivers 1.5
Details/Download at:
https://01.org/linuxgraphics/forums/general-discussion
David
Logged
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8
- (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks
Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) , BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
Re: Linux Lite 1.8 vs 2.0 Performance
«
Reply #2 on:
July 06, 2014, 05:35:22 PM »
Jerry
Linux Lite Creator
Administrator
Platinum Level Poster
8785
Posts
Reputation: 803
Linux Lite Member
CPU: Intel Core i9-10850K CPU @ 3.60GHz
MEMORY: 32Gb
VIDEO CARD: nVidia GeForce GTX 1650
Kernel: 5.x
Interesting, however most of the credit should go to the developers of the software we ship with LL. We just tie it all up into a distribution and make sure everything plays nice together, as well as some secret sauce tweaks
Logged
Download your free copy of Linux Lite today.
Jerry Bezencon
Linux Lite Creator
It wants no straps.
Linux Lite 1.8 vs 2.0 Performance
«
Reply #1 on:
July 06, 2014, 08:54:59 AM »
Wirezfree
PayPal Supporter
Platinum Level Poster
1484
Posts
Reputation: 405
Linux Lite "Advocate"
CPU: i7-4790S
MEMORY: 16Gb
VIDEO CARD: Intel HD4600 (Integrated)
Hi All,
Having now set-up LL2 to my liking I have completed a
"relative" performance test/difference using GtkPerf, available in synaptic package manager.
GtkPerf LinuxLite 1.8 LinuxLite 2.0
i5-3450s i5-3450s
Test Run 100 1000 100 1000
1 2.45 48.89 1.78 27.49
2 2.43 48.55 1.80 27.58
3 2.41 48.43 1.79 27.60
4 2.42 48.81 1.77 27.37
5 2.42 48.66 1.76 27.21
6 2.42 48.64 1.78 27.36
7 2.41 49.34 1.78 27.06
8 2.44 48.56 1.80 27.17
9 2.37 48.47 1.73 27.28
10 2.40 48.51 1.82 27.41
Total 24.17 486.86 17.81 273.53
Avg Secs 2.42 48.69 1.78 27.35
I''m seeing @ 30%+ improvement between 1.8 & 2.0
all this is relative, and my hardware.
But I'm impressed.
David
«
Last Edit: July 06, 2014, 09:04:48 AM by Wirezfree
»
Logged
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8
- (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks
Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) , BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
Send this topic
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Linux Lite Forums
»
General
»
Suggestions and Feedback
»
Linux Lite 1.8 vs 2.0 Performance
-->
X Close Ad
Linux Lite 7.0 RC1 Released - See Release Announcement Section