| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Forum Statistics |
» Members: 7,877
» Latest member: ShaunR
» Forum threads: 9,447
» Forum posts: 62,337
Full Statistics
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 1013 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 1009 Guest(s) Applebot, Bing, Facebook, Google
|
| Latest Threads |
Annoying behaviour on wak...
Forum: Start up and Shutdown
Last Post: ShaunR
Yesterday, 05:13 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 28
|
Cannot update my Linux Li...
Forum: Updates
Last Post: adara
01-24-2026, 05:08 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 71
|
Series 8 development News...
Forum: On Topic
Last Post: sqwuade
01-24-2026, 08:38 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 780
|
Is using Flashplayer risk...
Forum: Other
Last Post: stevef
01-24-2026, 07:21 AM
» Replies: 12
» Views: 14,741
|
Not Able to Install Googl...
Forum: Installing Software
Last Post: Orson_Yancey
01-18-2026, 08:38 PM
» Replies: 17
» Views: 1,034
|
Can't test LinuxLite 7.6 ...
Forum: Installing Linux Lite
Last Post: SharkyEXE
01-18-2026, 12:24 PM
» Replies: 24
» Views: 11,552
|
Can't test LinuxLite 7.6 ...
Forum: Installing Linux Lite
Last Post: SharkyEXE
01-18-2026, 08:10 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 64
|
Cant find up-to-date driv...
Forum: Video Cards
Last Post: justsumrandomcreture
01-13-2026, 02:18 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 123
|
update error - PPA (stace...
Forum: Updates
Last Post: stevef
01-12-2026, 11:19 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 156
|
trying to update (while) ...
Forum: Installing Linux Lite
Last Post: stevef
01-11-2026, 08:27 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 131
|
|
|
| How to configure fsck to run automatically |
|
Posted by: skippy95 - 05-31-2017, 06:46 PM - Forum: Other
- Replies (8)
|
 |
Questions:
Is fsck already configured to run after a certain amount of time or number of mounts?
If so, what command will show this?
If not, how do I configure fsck to run and fix errors after a certain number of mounts?
Is fsck configured to run and fix errors after a forced shutdown?
If not, how do I configure fsck to to run and fix errors after a forced shut down?
Should fsck be configured to run for these cases on a separate /home partition?
What I want to accomplish:
- fsck to auto run on /dev/sda1 and /dev/sda3 after so many boots and automatically fix errors.
- fsck to auto run on /dev/sda1 and /dev/sda3 after a forced shut down and automatically fix errors.
I'm running linux lite 3.4. I've been trying to figure out if fsck is already comfigured to run for the above cases, but I'm just not sure.
Also, my thinking is that, since /sda3 is a data partition with its own file system, and it mounts at boot, then fsck should be run on this part as well - please correct me if I'm wrong.
I don't know if it's necessary, but I'm including some output I've been looking at. All output is default from installation, I haven't change anything.
I'm still a newbie at this, and your help and information is greatly appreciated as I want to learn, and I want to learn to do it right.
Contents of /etc/init/mountall:
Code: script
. /etc/default/rcS || true
[ -f /forcefsck ] && force_fsck="--force-fsck"
[ "$FSCKFIX" = "yes" ] && fsck_fix="--fsck-fix"
...
end script
Contents of /etc/default/rcS:
Code: # automatically repair filesystems with inconsistencies during boot
#FSCKFIX=no
Contents of /etc/fstab:
Code: # / was on /dev/sda1 during installation
UUID=... / ext4 errors=remount-ro 0 1
# /home was on /dev/sda3 during installation
UUID=... /home ext4 defaults 0 2
Contents of /proc/mounts:
Code: /dev/sda1 / ext4 rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/sda3 /home ext4 rw,relatime,data=ordered 0 0
Output of tune2fs -l /dev/sda1:
Note: Last checked date value equals date and time of installation.
Code: Errors behavior: Continue
Mount count: 91
Maximum mount count: -1
Last checked: Mon May 8 08:12:12 2017
Check interval: 0 (<none>)
Output of tune2fs -l /dev/sda3
Note: Last checked date value equals date and time of installation.
Code: Errors behavior: Continue
Mount count: 98
Maximum mount count: -1
Last checked: Mon May 8 08:12:12 2017 (during installation)
Check interval: 0 (<none>)
Contents of /var/log/boot.log:
Note: boot.log shows a modified date of today.
Code: /dev/sda1: clean, 217267/1638400 files, 1317759/6553600 blocks
|
|
|
| Stop suspend on laptop lid close from startup |
|
Posted by: peter-j - 05-31-2017, 06:05 PM - Forum: Start up and Shutdown
- Replies (13)
|
 |
Hello
First post here and I just want to say that Linux Lite has made an otherwise useless piece of junk completely usable so thank you kindly to everyone involved for all your dedicated hard work.
My formerly useless piece of junk is a Toshiba M200 tablet PC. I have managed to get around majority of the issues except one. Being a tablet PC I tend to turn the screen around and lay it flat to the keyboard which also happens to be where the lid close switch is hidden, this causes the power management to suspend the system. I've changed the power management settings in XFCE and when logged in and at the desktop turning it into its tablet mode seems to have no effect and the machine doesn't suspend.
However on startup, if it is in tablet mode then the laptop will get so far then suspends. Powering on again just causes it to get a bit further then suspends again and this will continue 2-3 times before it crashes the system and I have to forcibly turn it off.
I have been into /etc/systemd/logind.conf and changed the option #HandleLidSuspend to ignore and restarted the service. I have also edited /etc/UPower/UPower.conf and set IgnoreLid to true. Is there anywhere else I need to look or change? Ideally I'd like to completely disable the lid close button.
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
| Hello |
|
Posted by: Vera - 05-31-2017, 02:58 PM - Forum: Introductions
- Replies (2)
|
 |
Hi, I recently installed LinuxLite on my old laptop and on my desktop computer. I was looking for an alternative to Windows 7 for the laptop in the wake of the recent ransomware scare. My laptop was pretty old and had some issues (like not applying Windows updates). If not for Linux, I would have had to get rid of the laptop since it had no protection from ransomware. That's what prompted me to make the switch to Linux when I did. It worked out so well for my laptop (now faster and better than it was under Windows 7) that I decided to make the switch for my main desktop PC too.
I first heard of LinuxLite from [member=6925]RandomBoy[/member] on Diaspora. There is a very active Linux community in general there, and everyone was very helpful with some of my newbie questions about which distros to try etc. LinuxLite worked out wonderfully for both my machines. I actually tried out other distros for my desktop PC also (a full install of one different distro, and live media of another) since the desktop PC was higher-specced than my laptop and could handle a heavier load. But even though my desktop could handle other distros just fine, LinuxLite was the clear winner for me in terms of a) overall looks, b) UX, and c) performance. Also, a huge factor for me that removed a lot of other distros from my consideration was the fact that many of them if you want to keep up-to-date will have to either a) go with a rolling release distro (a decent solution) or b) do a complete fresh install of the OS every year or so. The latter seemed rather silly in 2017 and beyond, so I love the longer support period of the LL releases. The release roadmap on the website was also a positive factor for me in deciding on LL.
It was also intuitive and easy to set up a custom disk partitioning scheme for my desktop PC the way I wanted with LL as compared with the other distro I tried. Both of my machines are Linux-only, no Windows anywhere on them. ;D
I'm pretty much a total newbie to Linux, although at a previous workplace I used Unix because that's the system they had. I was just an end user like most of us working there, not a dev and not an admin. We used it via command-line because that's pretty much all it ran on at the time. I hated the Vi editor with a passion, and I remember many of my files ending with Zzq from my attempts to quit the Vi editor(!) I don't remember much of the commands anymore now, I mainly was just handling spreadsheet-type of long files doing cat, grep, piping to other programs, etc. Although I'm comfortable looking up commands I need, I'm 100% new to the idea of admin-type tasks like installing software and applying updates like I need to know here for my own PC. I am slowly figuring out most of things I need to know bit by bit.
I'm glad to be here on the forums and learn from what others are saying. I'm open to input, so feel free to mention any words of advice you may have. Thanks.
|
|
|
| 1.6TB Data - Sharp Decline in file copying speeds between USB drives |
|
Posted by: m654321 - 05-31-2017, 09:13 AM - Forum: Hard Drives and SSDs
- Replies (7)
|
 |
Why do file copying speeds decline significantly over time, when transferring large amounts of data, following an initial burst?
Let me explain my recent experience.
I have 1.6TB of video recordings (i.e. 3000+ files classified under different subject folders) on a 4TB USB Seagate drive (ntfs formatted).
I'm now backing these up onto a newly formatted 4TB USB Samsung drive (ext4 formatted). File copying speeds, as indicated by the File Operations notification, were initially 112MB/s (4 hours shown to complete). Three hours later, this had slowed to 35MB/s (9 hours to complete); 6 hours later to 31 MB/s, etc... I should add that I'm using the GUI method of copying/pasting files and not any command-line method.
Is there any action one can take to maintain the initially high file copying speeds when copying large amount of data? Or, is the only way to maintain high speeds to laboriously copy smaller chunks of data at a time, rather than copying the whole lot (1.6TB) in one go as I have done. Would a command-line method be a more speed-efficient way to go?
Many thanks for your advice on this one
Mike
PS. Apologies if this post has come in bits, rather than all at once - I had problems posting it due to the 403 error forbidden message - I discovered the reason appeared to be the copying and pasting my post from LibreOffice Writer. The forbidden message didn't pop-up if I typed the post directly into the forum.
|
|
|
| "Updates" |
|
Posted by: SICKOFLINUX - 05-31-2017, 08:40 AM - Forum: On Topic
- Replies (15)
|
 |
Are they really necessary?
I have gone through UBUNTU 12.04 14.04 & 16.something before ending up with this Linux Lite & as with the other variants at each update & upgrade my operating system seems to get more dysfunctional.
This computer was working beautifully for a brief period of time before I upgraded & updated from the original Linux Lite I installed from a disk + the addition of Shotwell that I was helped to install through this forum but now the dysfunctional aspects are starting to get on my tits.
Could I just reinstall the original Linux Lite (2.04 I think it was) & stay with that,what would be the consequences?
|
|
|
| Dual boot Linux Lite 3.4 and openSUSE-Leap-42.2 |
|
Posted by: TMG1961 - 05-31-2017, 07:23 AM - Forum: Installing Software
- Replies (11)
|
 |
Recently i installed Linux Lite 3.4 64bit on a friends laptop. Now she asked me to create a dual boot with OpenSuse Leap 42.2
She has a SSD which i can split into 2 partitions, one for Linux Lite and one for OPenSuse. At the moment the drive is one large partition, no home partition or swap partition.
Now the question is how to make sure that both systems do boot after OPenSuse is installed.
|
|
|
| Cannot create folders to USB flash drives |
|
Posted by: torreydale - 05-31-2017, 02:24 AM - Forum: Other
- Replies (9)
|
 |
I know this is operating system related. I was able to do what I needed using the Live USB version of Linux Lite 3.4 64 bit. I cannot create a folder on flash drives that are FAT formatted. Last week I mistakenly downloaded and ran the 32 bit version of Etcher. I ran the 64 bit version (the version I needed) afterwards, and things seemed ok. Now it doesn't, and I cannot get any FAT formatted flashbacks drives to allow me to write to them. The permissions say root is the owner, but when I try to change it via the terminal, it doesn't make the change. I've even tried using older restore points to no avail. When right clicking in Thunar within the flash drive's storage space, the Create Folder, Create Document, and Paste options are grayed out.
I think I need some help cleaning up whatever mounts to sdb because I also created an sdb1 and I think that's just made things more messy.
|
|
|
| Blank screen after trying to put LL badge or sticker in cart |
|
Posted by: Vera - 05-30-2017, 08:19 PM - Forum: Suggestions and Feedback
- Replies (5)
|
 |
Hi, have I been doing something wrong, or is this a general issue? I have been trying to purchase 2 LinuxLite case badges, but when I try to add to cart, it then directs me to what seems to be the paypal website in a new window, but the problem is that the web page is blank. :-\ I've tried from my laptop, desktop and cellphone and the same issue persists (wow, I must be really eager to purchase the badges!)
1. Is this a general known issue? It happens at the point that items are added to cart, before any payment info is asked for.
2. Have I been doing the steps correctly? I went to this page: https://www.linuxliteos.com/shop.html and selected 2 case badges and clicked on the blue "Add to cart" button. That's when I get the new window and blank screen. If I have been doing it wrong, please tell me.
It seems this issue is specific to stickers/badges. If I test out the process with a T-shirt or coffee mug instead, it seems to direct properly to an online store.
Thanks so much for any info anyone can provide. 
Vera
|
|
|
|