Support Requests - CLICK TO READ BEFORE POSTING



Posted by: JesusLinux
02-03-2018, 03:52 PM
Forum: Other
- Replies (7)

Hey

I can't seem to install ITunes under Wine for LL.
I did the following after some research:
https://wiki.winehq.org/Ubuntu

Downloaded the ITunesSetuo.exe for 32bits from ITunes page.
Right click on it > Properties > Open with: Wine Windows Program Loader.

Double click on ITunesSetup.exe icon, after a while the ITunes installer launches it says:
"Gathering required information...
Status: Evaluating launch conditions"

Immediately a box appears saying:
"Install Failed
iTunes requires that your computer is running Windows 7 sp1 or newer"

Any help on this?
Thank you



Posted by: krisomilo
02-03-2018, 03:05 PM
Forum: Installing Linux Lite
- Replies (3)

Hi  I've used Linux Lite on a PC before and like it but now want to revive a perfectly good Mac Book Pro which is way past its "sell by date" - ie I've reached the maximum version of the O/S 10.6.8 and of course nothing works.  Because it is a sound machine and I don't want to throw it away. I would like both as a fun exercise and if successful as a working machine to install and run Linux.  One way (obviously) is to do a fresh OSX install and then run Parallels or Virtual Box but my preferred option is try to install Linux as the sole O/S on the machine.  I cannot find - but maybe haven't looked hard enough - any guidance.  So my question is does anyone have the experience? Be really glad to have any guidance that anyone can offer.  The PB is a 17" running an Intel Core 2 Duo @ 2.33Ghz - I think the processor is a 64-bit but that Apple have restricted it (EFI / Boot) to 32-bit.  What I want to try to achieve is to download and burn a bootable Linux Installer to use on the PB.  Thanks Kris.



Posted by: Lex24
02-03-2018, 11:38 AM
Forum: Installing Linux Lite
- Replies (7)

I have LL v2.8, it runs without any problems and I intend to keep it until it reaches end-of-life in April of 2019. But I'm considering kernel and processor microcode updates.

As it turns out, intel-microcode package has never been installed, although the machine has an Intel processor (old Core2Duo). The kernel is 3.19.0-33-generic:

Code:
cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=14.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=trusty DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Linux Lite 2.8"

Code:
inxi -C CPU:  Dual core Intel Core2 CPU 6300 (-MCP-) cache: 2048 KB flags: (lm nx sse sse2 sse3 ssse3 vmx)       Clock Speeds: 1: 1596.00 MHz 2: 1596.00 MHz

Code:
uname -r 3.19.0-33-generic

Code:
apt-cache policy intel-microcode intel-microcode:   Installed: (none)   Candidate: 3.20180108.0+really20170707ubuntu14.04.1   Version table:     3.20180108.0+really20170707ubuntu14.04.1 0         500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates/main amd64 Packages         500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-security/main amd64 Packages     2.20140122.1 0         500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/multiverse amd64 Packages


I have two questions:

1) The latest kernel that includes spectre mitigation updates recommended for Ubuntu v14.04 is 3.13.0-141.190 and it can be pulled from LL repos:

https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lin....0-141.190

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/Kno...ndMeltdown

Code:
apt-cache policy linux-headers-3.13.0-14 linux-headers-3.13.0-141-lowlatency:   Installed: (none)   Candidate: 3.13.0-141.190   Version table:     3.13.0-141.190 0         500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates/main amd64 Packages         500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-security/main amd64 Packages linux-headers-3.13.0-141-generic:   Installed: (none)   Candidate: 3.13.0-141.190   Version table:     3.13.0-141.190 0         500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates/main amd64 Packages         500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-security/main amd64 Packages linux-headers-3.13.0-141:   Installed: (none)   Candidate: 3.13.0-141.190   Version table:     3.13.0-141.190 0         500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates/main amd64 Packages         500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-security/main amd64 Packages

Are the following commands correct to install kernel and microcode updates? Has anyone tried that, have there been any problems reported anywhere?

Code:
sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get -y install linux-headers-3.13.0-141 linux-headers-3.13.0-141-generic linux-image-3.13.0-141-generic linux-image-extra-3.13.0-141-generic sudo apt-get install intel-microcode

2) Does intel-microcode need to be loaded ahead of initial ram disk, which would require initrd line in the bootloader to look as follows:

Code:
initrd /boot/intel-microcode.img /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-141-generic

I have replaced Grub2 bootloader with Grub4Dos (because of its simplicity), so I have to create menu.lst manually:

Code:
title Linux Lite root (hd1,4) kernel /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-141-generic root=UUID=c0af9bh9-39c8-519g-cz4j-87684beg7958 ro # intel processors only initrd /boot/intel-microcode.img /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-141-generic


-----
For the record:

a) according to ArchWiki loading processor microcode very early in the boot process and ahead of initial ram disk is only required with Intel processors. In case of AMD processors the microcode does not need to be loaded by the bootloader, at least for now:

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/microcode

b) the new versions of Grub4Dos can handle two image files placed on initrd line, as confirmed here:

http://reboot.pro/topic/21397-intel-proc...itrd-line/



Posted by: bluzeo
02-03-2018, 06:19 AM
Forum: Suggestions and Feedback
- Replies (1)

hey can ye please get telegram in the lite software manger?im getting an lil irritated with the fact when  i download it it doesnt go directly to be with the other installed apps. i been using Rambox to remedy that but i really prefer telegram official app.



Posted by: hackdorte
02-03-2018, 04:42 AM
Forum: Wallpapers
- Replies (3)

Simple and lightweight SVG wallpapers created in Inkscape.

Available in my Google Drive folder in SVG format (lighter weight).

Download

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1...sp=sharing

How to use?

Download it to your system (computer). Right-click (mouse) the SVG image on your system and choose "Set as Wallpaper".

Just it  Wink



Posted by: newtusmaximus
02-02-2018, 07:05 PM
Forum: On Topic
- Replies (5)

Jerry, I know your feelings about all things G.  I wonder however whether you would sort out Google Earth for linux so it can be loaded with ease from a ppa .



Posted by: bluzeo
02-02-2018, 10:21 AM
Forum: Other
- Replies (7)

Guys I was trying to get to my  music playing when the my session seriously stop having sound any ideas??


God Not dead.



Posted by: Robo_Pi
02-01-2018, 09:58 PM
Forum: Installing Software
- Replies (10)

I'm trying Linux for the first time.  I'm loading Linux Lite 3.8 on the following old notebook computer:

Compaq Persario CQ56
Intel Celeron 2.2Ghz processor
2 GB Memory
320 GB hard drive (brand new drive no preexisting OS)

Initial Installation

I've loaded Linux Lite 3.8 using a USB stick.
The original installation went fine the first try.
However I wasn't sure of some of the options to chose when installing.

Drive Configuration
I partitioned the drive into two units of about 150 GB each plus a small "swap area" with the leftover space.
I set the boot partition to be mounted at the "\", and set that to Primary.
I set the second partition to be mounted at the "\HOME" directory.
FIRST QUESTION: Can I set both partitions to be mounted at "\" or root position?
And if so would they then show up as two different drives?
The reason I ask is that the way it is now they only show up as one drive. 
And I'm guessing the second partition is actually the HOME directory? 
Is that right?
I would actually prefer to have the partitions show up as two physical drives.
This is somewhat trivial but I'm just not sure how this is working.
I like the second partition to show up as a whole separate drive.  That's the way I've always done it in Windows.

Drive Configuration Con't
I formatted both drive partitions with the ext4 file system simply because this was the default choice
I was tempted to use FAT 32 as I think it would suit my purposes and I like to use older compatible stuff.  ;D
The reason I ask will become clear later when I talk about OPENSHOT video editor.
SECOND QUESTION: Is it possible to format one partition in ext4 and the other partition in FAT 32?
The reason I ask is because I basically install programs on the boot drive with the OS.
And then I use the other partition as solely a DATA drive.
I'm thinking that it might be preferable to have the DATA in FAT 32 to facilitate older programs.
But I don't really know if this would be a problem or not.
In fact, I could just do everything in FAT 32.  I very seldom run out of space.  My DATA storage requirements are quite small.
Also just for the record, I use a lot of older software and very simple software.
I have very specific things I use the computer for.  And I don't download unnecessary junk.
I've never had a drive space issue and I've never had a drive larger than 500GB
So my usage is very minimal.  FAT 32 would probably be just fine for me if ext4 is an issue?

Quick Comment about the Initial Installation

Linux Lite installed just fine the first try. I then installed all the lasted updates.
It connected to WiFi with no problem
Firefox seems to be working just fine.
I only just did this yesterday but thus far no serious issues until I tried loading my first program:

OPENSHOT Video Editor
One of the first programs I wanted to use is a video editor called OPENSHOT
I downloaded the latest version for Linux.
No installation required, just "Make File Executable".
I did that and OPENSHOT opened.
However, I immediately noticed problems.  Right off the bat things weren't working right.  The program wasn't responding normally.
I tried to load an MP4 video file into the program and it just freezes and won't respond.  I have to go down to the task bar and click "Close window" to exit the frozen editor.
THIRD QUESTION: Could this problem be related to the ext4 file system?
The reason I'm suspecting this might be related is because OPENSHOT freezes up when trying to open a file.
So now I'm tempted to reinstall Linux using FAT32 instead of ext4 in the hopes that OPENSHOT might then run smoothly?

Anyway, that's where I'm currently at.  Linux seems to be working fine until I tried to run OPENSHOT.  I even downloaded OPENSHOT a second time to start fresh but that didn't help.  So now I'm suspecting that the ext4 file system might be related to this problem?

Recap of important questions:
FIRST QUESTION: Can I set both partitions to be mounted at "\" or root position?
I would like for the partitions to show up as individual drives if possible.
SECOND QUESTION: Is it possible to format one partition in ext4 and the other partition in FAT 32?
Or should I just do the whole shebang in FAT 32?
THIRD QUESTION: Could my problem with OPENSHOT be related to the ext4 file system?
I'm secretly hoping that if I reinstall Linux using FAT 32 OPENSHOT might then work ok.

Thank you for your patience to read my questions.




Posted by: bitsnpcs
02-01-2018, 06:17 PM
Forum: Scripting and Bash
- No Replies

Hold down Ctrl and Alt and press t (Ctrl Alt + t)

Copy/Paste (or type) in to your terminal -
Enter your password when asked.

Code:
sudo apt-get install cmatrix

Once installed if you copy/paste (or type) in to your terminal -

Code:
cmatrix

An animated matrix image scrolls downwards filling the terminal.

I made an example with SimpleScreenRecorder

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2vgIQPqtZM


Hold down Ctrl and press C (Ctrl+C) to exit back to your work in terminal.

I think it can be useful to stop people looking in your terminal, such as at your newly made random passwords whilst you are busy making some tea. 8)



Posted by: bitsnpcs
02-01-2018, 06:10 PM
Forum: Scripting and Bash
- No Replies

Hold down Ctrl and Alt and press t (Ctrl Alt +t)

Copy/paste (or type) in to your terminal -

Code:
telnet towel.blinkenlights.nl

You can watch Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope in ASCII