You are Here:
Linux Lite 6.6 FINAL Released - Support for 22 Languages Added - See Release Announcement Section



2.8 vs. 3.0

Author (Read 4649 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: 2.8 vs. 3.0
« Reply #8 on: June 03, 2016, 10:43:46 AM »
 

Coastie

  • PayPal Supporter
  • Gold Level Poster
  • *****
  • 656
    Posts
  • Reputation: 53
  • Linux Lite User
    • View Profile

  • CPU: AMD A10-6700 (ASUS M32)

  • MEMORY: 12Gb

  • VIDEO CARD: ADM Radeon HD (integrated)
The whole idea behind this project is to get Windows users to try a linux based operating system.

There's no pressure for existing linux users to install 3.0. Think of 3.0 as another version of Linux Lite for Windows folk to try.

 8)


Left Mac OS X for Linux in Jan 2014
 

Re: 2.8 vs. 3.0
« Reply #7 on: June 03, 2016, 10:04:56 AM »
 

Jerry

  • Linux Lite Creator
  • Administrator
  • Platinum Level Poster
  • *****
  • 8778
    Posts
  • Reputation: 802
  • Linux Lite Member
    • View Profile
    • Linux Lite OS

  • CPU: Intel Core i9-10850K CPU @ 3.60GHz

  • MEMORY: 32Gb

  • VIDEO CARD: nVidia GeForce GTX 1650

  • Kernel: 5.x
The whole idea behind this project is to get Windows users to try a linux based operating system.

There's no pressure for existing linux users to install 3.0. Think of 3.0 as another version of Linux Lite for Windows folk to try.
 

Re: 2.8 vs. 3.0
« Reply #6 on: June 03, 2016, 09:50:53 AM »
 

firenice03

  • Rockin' the FREE World
  • Global Moderator
  • Platinum Level Poster
  • *****
  • 1848
    Posts
  • Reputation: 284
  • Linux Lite Member
    • View Profile

  • CPU: AMD E2//Atom X5//AMD Phenom II X2

  • MEMORY: 4Gb

  • VIDEO CARD: AMD Mullin Radeon R2//Intel//AMD/ATI RS880

  • Kernel: 5.x
My .02 ;)

I installed BETA to a desktop along with 2.8 - I still run 2.8 for the majority...
On the Mini - I upgraded to a SSD and since it was a new HD I figured LL3.0 was the best route..

I have noticed a few minor things in the plus and minus columns, nothing as a just gotta have or a show stopper thou.

3.0 does seem to boot faster, it maybe that I've been using the mini more but I guess I could time it on the desktop..
For other benefits, see the 1st page of https://www.linuxliteos.com/forums/release-announcements/linux-lite-3-0-final-released/

On the other side; having to set everything back up..
Apps, hardware/drivers, tweaks and modification to settings and apps; apps that have changed/updated that may not work as well as before (Conky is an example, not a LL issue) and XYZ to get back to an as it was before state..

Update if your ready to take on the task or as mentioned 2.8 is still supported  8)
« Last Edit: June 03, 2016, 09:53:34 AM by firenice03 »
LL4.8 UEFI 64 bit ASUS E402W - AMD E2 (Quad) 1.5Ghz  - 4GB - AMD Mullins Radeon R2
LL5.8 UEFI 64 bit Test UEFI Kangaroo (Mobile Desktop) - Atom X5-Z8500 1.44Ghz - 2GB - Intel HD Graphics
LL4.8 64 bit HP 6005- AMD Phenom II X2 - 8GB - AMD/ATI RS880 (HD4200)
LL3.8 32 bit Dell Inspiron Mini - Atom N270 1.6Ghz - 1GB - Intel Mobile 945GSE Express  -- Shelved
BACK LL5.8 64 bit Dell Optiplex 160 (Thin) - Atom 230 1.6Ghz - 4GB-SiS 771/671 PCIE VGA - Print Server
Running Linux Lite since LL2.2
 

Re: 2.8 vs. 3.0
« Reply #5 on: June 03, 2016, 09:29:36 AM »
 

Coastie

  • PayPal Supporter
  • Gold Level Poster
  • *****
  • 656
    Posts
  • Reputation: 53
  • Linux Lite User
    • View Profile

  • CPU: AMD A10-6700 (ASUS M32)

  • MEMORY: 12Gb

  • VIDEO CARD: ADM Radeon HD (integrated)
Development for 2.8 has ceased, but you will continue to get security updates to your installed packages until April 2019.  The advantage of moving to the next series is getting newer versions of packages, not just security updates.  You'll also receive the newer functions and features (if any) of those updated packages.  But it's perfectly fine to wait a while. 

I have installed version 3.0 to a virtual machine using Virtualbox so that I can participate in supporting forum users, but I haven't installed it to my laptop or desktop yet.  And I'm in no rush.

Thanks, torreydale, that answers my question. I won't be in rush either. I'll wait for a while to see if any bugs are found and fixed and I feel like spending a couple of hours tweaking, etc. ;D
« Last Edit: June 03, 2016, 09:33:18 AM by Coastie »


Left Mac OS X for Linux in Jan 2014
 

Re: 2.8 vs. 3.0
« Reply #4 on: June 03, 2016, 09:23:30 AM »
 

Coastie

  • PayPal Supporter
  • Gold Level Poster
  • *****
  • 656
    Posts
  • Reputation: 53
  • Linux Lite User
    • View Profile

  • CPU: AMD A10-6700 (ASUS M32)

  • MEMORY: 12Gb

  • VIDEO CARD: ADM Radeon HD (integrated)
I think the better question is, "what is the DISadvantage of moving to 3.0?". ...

OK.

1. My favorite theme may not work. http://www.linuxliteos.com/forums/release-announcements/linux-lite-3-0-final-released/msg23846/#msg23846

2. Got a lot of tweaking to do to get everything looking and working the way I like.

3. Programs to install again.

So what are the advantages of moving to 3.0?


Left Mac OS X for Linux in Jan 2014
 

Re: 2.8 vs. 3.0
« Reply #3 on: June 03, 2016, 09:17:09 AM »
 

torreydale

  • PayPal Supporter
  • Platinum Level Poster
  • *****
  • 1588
    Posts
  • Reputation: 261
  • * Forum Moderator *
    • View Profile

  • CPU: Intel i5-3230M (4) @ 3.200GHz

  • MEMORY: 16Gb

  • VIDEO CARD: Intel 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics

  • Kernel: 5.x
Development for 2.8 has ceased, but you will continue to get security updates to your installed packages until April 2019.  The advantage of moving to the next series is getting newer versions of packages, not just security updates.  You'll also receive the newer functions and features (if any) of those updated packages.  But it's perfectly fine to wait a while. 

I have installed version 3.0 to a virtual machine using Virtualbox so that I can participate in supporting forum users, but I haven't installed it to my laptop or desktop yet.  And I'm in no rush.
Want to thank me?  Click my [Thank] link.
 

Re: 2.8 vs. 3.0
« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2016, 03:42:15 AM »
 

Monkeyman

  • Forum Regular
  • ***
  • 227
    Posts
  • Reputation: 14
  • Jesus Freak
    • View Profile

  • CPU: AMD Phenom II (old skool!)

  • MEMORY: 4Gb

  • VIDEO CARD: GeForce 450
I think the better question is, "what is the DISadvantage of moving to 3.0?".  I've got 2.8 on my desktop and 3.0 on my laptop.  So far, I'm not seeing any huge differences but I'd still rather stay on top of the game.
 

2.8 vs. 3.0
« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2016, 12:32:39 AM »
 

Coastie

  • PayPal Supporter
  • Gold Level Poster
  • *****
  • 656
    Posts
  • Reputation: 53
  • Linux Lite User
    • View Profile

  • CPU: AMD A10-6700 (ASUS M32)

  • MEMORY: 12Gb

  • VIDEO CARD: ADM Radeon HD (integrated)
What are the advantages of moving to 3.0 instead of just staying with 2.8? I think 2.8 will be supported until April 2019.  :-\
« Last Edit: June 03, 2016, 10:51:56 AM by Jerry »


Left Mac OS X for Linux in Jan 2014
 

 

-->
X Close Ad

Linux Lite 6.6 FINAL Released - Support for 22 Languages Added - See Release Announcement Section