0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
People post 'fixes' here. But that doesn't automatically translate to one size fits all. I have the /etc/network/if-up.d/update file and my boot times are not adversely affected by it. The other contributors here have also not reported a problem. As an OS provider, one must tread extremely carefully and usually only 'fix' things that affect the majority of people, and only then, with no foreseeable adverse affects. I can predict with more certainty how a necessary bug fix will affect everyone, but with this, I don't like to play 'trial and error' with 1000's of computers. There's a balance to consider. Interesting thread nonetheless. Thank you.
neofetch ,xXc rew@studlin460s .l0MMMMMO --------------- .kNMMMMMWMMMN, OS: Linux Lite 6.2 x86_64 KMMMMMMKMMMMMMo Host: 20FAS54D00 ThinkPad T460s 'MMMMMMNKMMMMMM: Kernel: 5.15.0-56-generic kMMMMMMOMMMMMMO Uptime: 11 mins .MMMMMMX0MMMMMW. Packages: 2401 (dpkg) oMMMMMMxWMMMMM: Shell: bash 5.1.16 WMMMMMNkMMMMMO Resolution: 2560x1440 :MMMMMMOXMMMMW DE: Xfce .0MMMMMxMMMMM; WM: Xfwm4 :;cKMMWxMMMMO WM Theme: Materia 'MMWMMXOMMMMl Theme: Materia [GTK2/3] kMMMMKOMMMMMX: Icons: Papirus-Adapta [GTK2], Adwaita [GTK3] .WMMMMKOWMMM0c Terminal: xfce4-terminal lMMMMMWO0MNd:' Terminal Font: Droid Sans Mono 12 oollXMKXoxl;. CPU: Intel i7-6600U (4) @ 3.400GHz ':. .: .' GPU: Intel Skylake GT2 [HD Graphics 520] .. Memory: 1615MiB / 19739MiB
systemd-analyze blame
journalctl -u networking.service -b
system-analyze plot
What is the output of:Code: [Select]systemctl list-dependencies --reverse network-online.target
systemctl list-dependencies --reverse network-online.target
systemctl list-dependencies --reverse network-online.target network-online.target● ├─cups-browsed.service● ├─hddtemp.service● ├─nmbd.service● ├─packagekit.service● └─smbd.service
QuoteWith third-party I am talking about the packages I tend to install ... I don't think it makes sense to post a full list of all my deps.Do you notice the problem with the boot times of the machines prior to installing your third party packages ?If I suspected third party package may be responsible I'd be doing analysis of boot ups before and after the third party stuff installation.
With third-party I am talking about the packages I tend to install ... I don't think it makes sense to post a full list of all my deps.
sudo apt update[sudo] password for rew: Hit:1 http://ubuntu.ethz.ch/ubuntu jammy InReleaseHit:2 http://ubuntu.ethz.ch/ubuntu jammy-updates InRelease Hit:3 http://ubuntu.ethz.ch/ubuntu jammy-backports InRelease Hit:4 http://ubuntu.ethz.ch/ubuntu jammy-security InRelease Hit:5 https://ppa.launchpadcontent.net/mozillateam/ppa/ubuntu jammy InRelease Hit:6 http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu jammy InRelease Hit:7 http://repo.linuxliteos.com/linuxlite fluorite InReleaseReading package lists... DoneBuilding dependency tree... DoneReading state information... Done9 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them.
If this is your PC - http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/newsroom/press_kits/2008/connecting/ds_bn_6730b.pdf I wouldn't expect miracle boot times once the networking issue is resolved. Windows Vista Throw in an SSD (if possible) and tweak the boot, static IP helps a lot, and you should be in business.
Startup finished in 6.053s (kernel) + 8.989s (userspace) = 15.043s graphical.target reached after 8.962s in userspace
Could you please embed the images in your post as jpegs or pngs. People are unlikely to trust the contents of this type of zip file as it's very easy to integrate malicious code into an svg. See - https://www.linuxliteos.com/forums/introductions/forum-posting-guidelines/
Topic moved to Startup and Shutdown section.Quote from: rew on January 02, 2023, 10:51:23 AMI guess each and every lite user is suffering from this. Or could it be that it derives from third-party, that I'm used to install on all these machines?There are occasional reports of slow boot time - usually on older hardware, but I hope each and every user isn't having significant delays. I've had a system on version 6.0/6.2 since and haven't seen this.You mention third-party something - what is this ?
I guess each and every lite user is suffering from this. Or could it be that it derives from third-party, that I'm used to install on all these machines?
neofetch ,xXc rew@studentbook .l0MMMMMO --------------- .kNMMMMMWMMMN, OS: Linux Lite 6.0 x86_64 KMMMMMMKMMMMMMo Host: HP Compaq 6730b (NN238ET#UUZ) F.13 'MMMMMMNKMMMMMM: Kernel: 5.15.0-56-generic kMMMMMMOMMMMMMO Uptime: 1 min .MMMMMMX0MMMMMW. Packages: 2709 (dpkg) oMMMMMMxWMMMMM: Shell: bash 5.1.16 WMMMMMNkMMMMMO Resolution: 1680x1050 :MMMMMMOXMMMMW DE: Xfce .0MMMMMxMMMMM; WM: Xfwm4 :;cKMMWxMMMMO WM Theme: Materia 'MMWMMXOMMMMl Theme: Materia [GTK2/3] kMMMMKOMMMMMX: Icons: Papirus-Adapta [GTK2], Adwaita [GTK3] .WMMMMKOWMMM0c Terminal: xfce4-terminal lMMMMMWO0MNd:' Terminal Font: Droid Sans Mono 12 oollXMKXoxl;. CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 (2) @ 2.667GHz ':. .: .' GPU: Intel Mobile 4 Series Chipset .. Memory: 564MiB / 3824MiB .