[ralphy]

Tweak can use some polishing.

- Rename Title to Numlock or Lite Tweaks - Numlock
- Hide dialog header title or column headers Select | Option (they are redundant)
- Add options description (Enables Numlock during Login) / (Disables Numlock during Login)

[valtam]

[ralphy]

Pushed to master! Your feedback is appreciated.

[valtam]

Haven't had much time to test, but the thing that stood out the most was all the confirmation boxes after a task had completed. I would prefer they did not appear, but the error checking is still important. Lite Tweaks is such that people select multiple tasks to perform at once. The whole experience seems drawn out now. That would be the only I would change there so far. Thanks Ralphy.

[ralphy]

... the thing that stood out the most was all the confirmation boxes after a task had completed. I would prefer they did not appear, but the error checking is still important. Lite Tweaks is such that people select multiple tasks to perform at once. The whole experience seems drawn out now.

Opsss... It looks like I completely missed the relevance of not having confirmation dialogs. It does take away that experience completely. I guess I was focused on letting the user know the task completed dismissing the importance of not having them nagged. My bad!

So, I think it is important to re-evaluate whether a loop in tweaks should be used at all then. I will start first by removing the confirmation dialogs in all tweaks that do not requires interaction and we will go from there... we can evaluate again once this is done.

[valtam]

Sounds good Ralphy, thank you.

Sent from my Phone using Tapatalk

[ralphy]

I'm about to push a new commit now. Removes the confirmations and the non interactive experience is restored.

I would like to hear your feedback (after this push) about those tweaks that do require some interaction at this point:

- Numlock (loops because it shows current state and allows user to change on the fly)
- Disk usage (loops because there might be more than one partition wished to be open in file manager by the user)
- Locate Large Files (loops to ask the user if she/he wants to run a different scan criteria)
- Hostname (should be self explanatory based on its functionality)

Off to GH now. Committed!

I gotta tell you Jerry, that experience of not being nagged is actually a main feature! You're absolutely right.

[valtam]

No problem Ralphy. I'm at work right now so I'll give this a good run in the next 24hrs.

Sent from my Phone using Tapatalk

[ralphy]

Cool. Let me know!

[valtam]

I'm loving this latest pull, definitely on the right path here.