0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.
Also, is KDE easier to manage for appearance setting. icons and "theme-ing" than XFCE?I always had some trouble going from one config page to another for basically the "looks" of the DE.And side question, do you have to re-program your Lite "softwares" for KDE? :-S
@Jerry The pictures you sent showing descriptions in the menu almost sold me KDE! If you can have that and categories I"ll give it a try in your test build.Also, is KDE easier to manage for appearance setting. icons and "theme-ing" than XFCE?I always had some trouble going from one config page to another for basically the "looks" of the DE.And side question, do you have to re-program your Lite "softwares" for KDE? :-S
A much less desirable possibility would be basing LL on KDE neon...
The rapid pace of KDE development against a - shall we say "slow and steady" - platform like Debian/Ubuntu means that the released version of Plasma can be years ahead of what is available to end users. There are ongoing conflicts with Qt versions clashing with some apps as well.In fairness I think that you do need to be on a rolling release base like PCLOS in order to get the benefit of the development process which is behind KDE.
but for how you portrayed the vision of prefabricated distros altogether, I start to believe everyone should actually assemble their own distro, albeit this would not be particularly Windows-folk friendly, right?
The default Menu is growing on me. The more I use and customize it, the easier it appears for me to use.