You are Here:
Linux Lite 6.6 FINAL Released - Support for 22 Languages Added - See Release Announcement Section



ATI Radeon Xpress 200

Author (Read 11918 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: ATI Radeon Xpress 200
« Reply #15 on: January 17, 2017, 11:29:36 PM »
 

bitsnpcs

  • Platinum Level Poster
  • **********
  • 3237
    Posts
  • Reputation: 305
    • View Profile
    • Try to Grow

  • Kernel: 4.x
Thank you for the help and wb LL-User  :)
 

Re: ATI Radeon Xpress 200
« Reply #14 on: January 17, 2017, 10:12:20 PM »
 

LL-user

  • I come here a lot
  • *****
  • 455
    Posts
  • Reputation: 214
  • Linux Lite Member
    • View Profile
 

Re: ATI Radeon Xpress 200
« Reply #13 on: January 17, 2017, 09:45:25 PM »
 

bitsnpcs

  • Platinum Level Poster
  • **********
  • 3237
    Posts
  • Reputation: 305
    • View Profile
    • Try to Grow

  • Kernel: 4.x
Thank you
I have this error on 3.2
Code: [Select]
N: Ignoring file '20auto-upgrades.ucf-dist' in directory '/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/' as it has an invalid filename extension
 

Re: ATI Radeon Xpress 200
« Reply #12 on: January 17, 2017, 09:30:17 PM »
 

torreydale

  • PayPal Supporter
  • Platinum Level Poster
  • *****
  • 1588
    Posts
  • Reputation: 261
  • * Forum Moderator *
    • View Profile

  • CPU: Intel i5-3230M (4) @ 3.200GHz

  • MEMORY: 16Gb

  • VIDEO CARD: Intel 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics

  • Kernel: 5.x
The 2.6 error is related to Google Chrome dropping 32-bit support.  Unfortunately it affected everyone.  The fix for that is located here:
https://www.linuxliteos.com/forums/installing-software/fix-for-google-chrome-on-linux-lite/
Want to thank me?  Click my [Thank] link.
 

Re: ATI Radeon Xpress 200
« Reply #11 on: January 17, 2017, 06:25:28 PM »
 

bitsnpcs

  • Platinum Level Poster
  • **********
  • 3237
    Posts
  • Reputation: 305
    • View Profile
    • Try to Grow

  • Kernel: 4.x
I installed 2.6 and, error:updates would not fetch, Lite Upgrade gave me the option to upgrade to 2.4.
I rechecked the system details to ensure it was 2.6.
I think it may be because of the Ubuntu servers maintenance and not having the updates.
There were no additional drivers shown and the displays maximum was 1024x768.

I decided to reinstall LL 3.2, this time during install I did not tick install extras for graphics, mp3 etc, the fonts are no longer blurry :) .
I'll have to try and add those extras and see if they go blurry again.
The maximum available resolution is still 1024x768.
I have changed the CPU driver to the proprietary one, and done LL updates, and also installed restricted extras.

I have not tried another monitor, this monitor is named E19T5W-EU.

Now the blurry font is solved. I may need to get a new graphics card suitable for watching video though.
 

Re: ATI Radeon Xpress 200
« Reply #10 on: January 16, 2017, 08:37:31 PM »
 

firenice03

  • Rockin' the FREE World
  • Global Moderator
  • Platinum Level Poster
  • *****
  • 1848
    Posts
  • Reputation: 284
  • Linux Lite Member
    • View Profile

  • CPU: AMD E2//Atom X5//AMD Phenom II X2

  • MEMORY: 4Gb

  • VIDEO CARD: AMD Mullin Radeon R2//Intel//AMD/ATI RS880

  • Kernel: 5.x
Quote
@firenice03 - did you try the step of remove your /etc/X11/xorg.conf , if so did it help ?

No I don't recall doing.. Like you I found myself missing a "good" driver. Its not LL fault, its AMD they ended the fglrx driver in 14.04 (Ubuntu) nor the ATI Catalyst and from what I read, don't try to compile/copy it into 16.04 too many differences.
The drive that installs is a decent enough driver its the final tweaking that it lacks..
I can attempt removing the file and booting at best I suppose it will boot back to the original resolution max 1024x768...
For kicks have you tried another monitor? I ask as with mine a different monitor did change the resolutions available (driver being ok) just lacking for this other monitor...

I'll remove the conf file and reboot...

Additional info in the manual https://www.linuxliteos.com/manual/hardware.html#graphics


**UPDATE**
Renamed the xorg.conf file and rebooted - no file in its place.. As expected the it booted to the 1024x768 as the max resolution.
Reverted back to using the file, I can use my setting of 1280x1024 ;) (I also have due to the file 1280x768 and 1280x800 as I was testing)

Hope you guys find something :)
« Last Edit: January 16, 2017, 08:46:59 PM by firenice03 »
LL4.8 UEFI 64 bit ASUS E402W - AMD E2 (Quad) 1.5Ghz  - 4GB - AMD Mullins Radeon R2
LL5.8 UEFI 64 bit Test UEFI Kangaroo (Mobile Desktop) - Atom X5-Z8500 1.44Ghz - 2GB - Intel HD Graphics
LL4.8 64 bit HP 6005- AMD Phenom II X2 - 8GB - AMD/ATI RS880 (HD4200)
LL3.8 32 bit Dell Inspiron Mini - Atom N270 1.6Ghz - 1GB - Intel Mobile 945GSE Express  -- Shelved
BACK LL5.8 64 bit Dell Optiplex 160 (Thin) - Atom 230 1.6Ghz - 4GB-SiS 771/671 PCIE VGA - Print Server
Running Linux Lite since LL2.2
 

Re: ATI Radeon Xpress 200
« Reply #9 on: January 16, 2017, 08:30:38 PM »
 

torreydale

  • PayPal Supporter
  • Platinum Level Poster
  • *****
  • 1588
    Posts
  • Reputation: 261
  • * Forum Moderator *
    • View Profile

  • CPU: Intel i5-3230M (4) @ 3.200GHz

  • MEMORY: 16Gb

  • VIDEO CARD: Intel 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics

  • Kernel: 5.x
Yes.  Anything that shows in the Kernel Removal tool of Lite Tweaks will be old and/or the kernel you're not currently booted to.

Yes, the terminal will stay open after the install of the kernel update, ie "sudo apt-get install linux-generic".
Want to thank me?  Click my [Thank] link.
 

Re: ATI Radeon Xpress 200
« Reply #8 on: January 16, 2017, 08:00:42 PM »
 

bitsnpcs

  • Platinum Level Poster
  • **********
  • 3237
    Posts
  • Reputation: 305
    • View Profile
    • Try to Grow

  • Kernel: 4.x
Will the old kernels be named as kernels and version number in Lite Tweaks ?
Will the terminal remain open to read the new kernel number, or ask y/n for confirmation and allow reading, or will it auto close quickly and I will need to reopen and check kernel version ?

If I can get the fonts reading well it will be good, updating manually will give me practice.
 

Re: ATI Radeon Xpress 200
« Reply #7 on: January 16, 2017, 07:26:37 PM »
 

torreydale

  • PayPal Supporter
  • Platinum Level Poster
  • *****
  • 1588
    Posts
  • Reputation: 261
  • * Forum Moderator *
    • View Profile

  • CPU: Intel i5-3230M (4) @ 3.200GHz

  • MEMORY: 16Gb

  • VIDEO CARD: Intel 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics

  • Kernel: 5.x
If you do install LL 2.6 and use Lite Upgrade to upgrade to LL 2.8, you'll be on the 3.13.x long term support kernel.  As with the operating system, that kernel is supported until April 2019.  Unlike the 3.x series which installs kernel security updates as part of the Install Updates utility, in the 2.x series, you have to update the kernel manually.  So every so often (biweekly to monthly), I run the following in a terminal:

Code: [Select]
sudo apt-get install linux-generic
And then I remove the old kernels using Lite Tweaks.  Right now, I'm on kernel 3.13.0-107-generic, which is the newest version.
Want to thank me?  Click my [Thank] link.
 

Re: ATI Radeon Xpress 200
« Reply #6 on: January 16, 2017, 06:51:47 PM »
 

bitsnpcs

  • Platinum Level Poster
  • **********
  • 3237
    Posts
  • Reputation: 305
    • View Profile
    • Try to Grow

  • Kernel: 4.x
Thank you for your help torreydale  :)
I've d/l and checked 2.6, I'll burn it in a minute.
I will do the live session tomorrow, and will reply how it goes.
 

Re: ATI Radeon Xpress 200
« Reply #5 on: January 16, 2017, 05:36:36 PM »
 

torreydale

  • PayPal Supporter
  • Platinum Level Poster
  • *****
  • 1588
    Posts
  • Reputation: 261
  • * Forum Moderator *
    • View Profile

  • CPU: Intel i5-3230M (4) @ 3.200GHz

  • MEMORY: 16Gb

  • VIDEO CARD: Intel 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics

  • Kernel: 5.x
I'd say to keep the CPU proprietary driver from Intel.

Fglrx was more than likely not installed as part of Linux Lite 3.2.  That package (fglrx) was in the LL 2.x series, and it contained proprietary AMD drivers.  You can verify it isn't installed by going to Install/Remove Software and searching for fglrx. 

On xorg.conf, you probably don't have that file located at /etc/X11.  If so, there's nothing to remove, and I would disregard that step.

If you aren't satisfied with the results after following this the best you can, it may be worth booting up to a Live version of the 2.x series.  If things there perform well there, install 2.x.  I would suggest installing version 2.6 and doing a Lite Upgrade to 2.8.  I say to do that for Long Term Support (LTS) kernel reasons.  That series is still supported until April 2019.  That's 2.33 more years.
Want to thank me?  Click my [Thank] link.
 

Re: ATI Radeon Xpress 200
« Reply #4 on: January 16, 2017, 03:47:50 PM »
 

bitsnpcs

  • Platinum Level Poster
  • **********
  • 3237
    Posts
  • Reputation: 305
    • View Profile
    • Try to Grow

  • Kernel: 4.x
First off, welcome back to the forum!  You took a sabbatical around the time I was joining the forum.

Your profile shows you using Linux Lite 3.2 and an ATI graphics card, which is AMD related.  AMD didn't get their proprietary drivers in Ubuntu 16.04, which is what the Linux Lite 3.x series is based on.  So I'm not sure what you mean when you write:

Quote
I have tried selecting the proprietary driver

If you mean you selected the proprietary driver for your CPU because it was unselected at the time, I would keep that selection.  Your graphics issue is more than likely related to the fact that your graphics card is AMD related.  As a result, you're having to use the open source AMD drivers instead of the AMD proprietary drivers.  I've had some success with the open source driver, but it is going to be a best effort driver and not perfect for everyone's setup.

An additional resource may be located here:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/RadeonDriver

hello,
thank you for the welcome back :) . I think I had begun to learn last time, but have not retained that start.
Yes I have just begun to set up this computer with LL 3.2 today, my other LL computer is on v2.n.
Which selection should I keep for the CPU, proprietary or none ?

On the link you gave me I tried so far

Code: [Select]
lspci | grep -E 'VGA|Display'It supplied a result of chipset RS400, this is the first entry on the table of Fully Supported, with ticks for, Ubuntu 12.04, 14.04, and 16.04+

I then continued on to -

Code: [Select]
dmesg | egrep 'drm|radeon'
Which produced no errors

I then continued to -
 
Code: [Select]
sudo apt-get install mesa-utils
LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo

to "Make sure your OpenGL renderer string does not say "software rasterizer" or "llvmpipe"", it did not say either of these.

The next step of, "removing the fglrx driver" if you've previously installed it, I am unsure if this is installed as part of LL 3.2 ?

The final step of -
"Recommended configuration for X.org No configuration is necessary for ATI driver in the modern versions of Ubuntu.  You can safely take away your /etc/X11/xorg.conf and your computer should run fine."

I do not know how to do this?

@firenice03 - did you try the step of remove your /etc/X11/xorg.conf , if so did it help ?
« Last Edit: January 16, 2017, 03:51:00 PM by bitsnpcs »
 

Re: ATI Radeon Xpress 200
« Reply #3 on: January 16, 2017, 11:35:18 AM »
 

firenice03

  • Rockin' the FREE World
  • Global Moderator
  • Platinum Level Poster
  • *****
  • 1848
    Posts
  • Reputation: 284
  • Linux Lite Member
    • View Profile

  • CPU: AMD E2//Atom X5//AMD Phenom II X2

  • MEMORY: 4Gb

  • VIDEO CARD: AMD Mullin Radeon R2//Intel//AMD/ATI RS880

  • Kernel: 5.x

Video on YouTube plays correctly, fonts are blurry on the forum and desktop, display settings are at 1024x768, the other options are lower.
I want to use 1440x900 as it is correct one for this monitor.

I have tried selecting the proprietary driver, this does not alter the view, and the display resolution choices remain at 1024x768 maximum.

Is there a driver available that is not listed that would resolve this ?

Driver, no not really... LL2.x series has better ATI/AMD support (as its based on 14.04)..
I was able to set the resolution on the 6005 in my sig by modifying the xorg.conf file to the resolution I needed..
- I noticed with a different monitor attached this wasn't necessary - but that wasn't the plan...

So I too was stuck at 1024x768 and needed at least a 1280x1024

*Note some resolution may not work and could inadvertently leave you in a unusable state - I would typically correct in tty, using nano to edit the conf file (does require sudo)..

Here is a copy of my xorg.conf file in the /etc/X11 folder..
Code: [Select]
Section "Device"
  Identifier "Configured Video Device"
  Driver "radeon"
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
    Identifier    "Configured Monitor"
    Vendorname    "Generic LCD Display"
    Modelname    "LCD Panel 1280x1024"
    HorizSync 20-107
        VertRefresh 50-185
  modeline  "800x600@56" 36.0 800 824 896 1024 600 601 603 625 +hsync +vsync
  modeline  "800x600@60" 40.0 800 840 968 1056 600 601 605 628 +hsync +vsync
  modeline  "1024x768@60" 80.14 1280 1344 1480 1680 768 769 772 795 -hsync +vsync
  modeline  "1024x768@60" 74.48 1280 1336 1472 1664 720 721 724 746 -hsync +vsync
  modeline  "1024x768@60" 83.46 1280 1344 1480 1680 800 801 804 828 -hsync +vsync
#  modeline  "1280x1024@60" 60 80.14 1280 1344 1480 1680 768 769 772 -hsync +vsync
#  modeline  "1280x1024@75" 83.46 1280 1344 1480 1680 800 801 804 828 -hsync +vsync
#  modeline  "1280x1024@86" 80.14 1400 1280 1344 1480 1680 768 769 772 -hsync +vsync
  modeline  "1280x1024@75" 135.0 1280 1296 1440 1688 1024 1025 1028 1066 +hsync +vsync
  modeline  "1280x1024@60" 108.0 1280 1328 1440 1688 1024 1025 1028 1066 +hsync +vsync
#  modeline  "1400x1050@60" 83.46 14001280 1344 1480 1680 800 801 804 828 -hsync +vsync
#  modeline  "1680x1200@60" 80.14 1680 1280 1344 1480 1680 768 769 772 795 -hsync +vsync
#  modeline  "1680x1200@60" 83.46 1680 1280 1344 1480 1680 800 801 804 828 -hsync +vsync
    Gamma    1.0
EndSection

Section "Screen"
    Identifier    "Default Screen"
    Monitor        "Configured Monitor"
    Device        "Configured Video Device"
    Defaultdepth    24
    SubSection "Display"
        Depth    24
        Virtual    1280    1024
        Modes          "1400x1120@60"    "1280x1024@86"    "1280x1024@60"    "1024x768@60"    "1024x768@60"     "800x600@60"    "1024x768@60"     "800x600@56"
    EndSubSection
EndSection

I tried various resolutions and mhz/refresh rates settings that worked best - knowing what your monitor supports is ideal.
LL4.8 UEFI 64 bit ASUS E402W - AMD E2 (Quad) 1.5Ghz  - 4GB - AMD Mullins Radeon R2
LL5.8 UEFI 64 bit Test UEFI Kangaroo (Mobile Desktop) - Atom X5-Z8500 1.44Ghz - 2GB - Intel HD Graphics
LL4.8 64 bit HP 6005- AMD Phenom II X2 - 8GB - AMD/ATI RS880 (HD4200)
LL3.8 32 bit Dell Inspiron Mini - Atom N270 1.6Ghz - 1GB - Intel Mobile 945GSE Express  -- Shelved
BACK LL5.8 64 bit Dell Optiplex 160 (Thin) - Atom 230 1.6Ghz - 4GB-SiS 771/671 PCIE VGA - Print Server
Running Linux Lite since LL2.2
 

Re: ATI Radeon Xpress 200
« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2017, 10:25:14 AM »
 

torreydale

  • PayPal Supporter
  • Platinum Level Poster
  • *****
  • 1588
    Posts
  • Reputation: 261
  • * Forum Moderator *
    • View Profile

  • CPU: Intel i5-3230M (4) @ 3.200GHz

  • MEMORY: 16Gb

  • VIDEO CARD: Intel 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics

  • Kernel: 5.x
First off, welcome back to the forum!  You took a sabbatical around the time I was joining the forum.

Your profile shows you using Linux Lite 3.2 and an ATI graphics card, which is AMD related.  AMD didn't get their proprietary drivers in Ubuntu 16.04, which is what the Linux Lite 3.x series is based on.  So I'm not sure what you mean when you write:

Quote
I have tried selecting the proprietary driver

If you mean you selected the proprietary driver for your CPU because it was unselected at the time, I would keep that selection.  Your graphics issue is more than likely related to the fact that your graphics card is AMD related.  As a result, you're having to use the open source AMD drivers instead of the AMD proprietary drivers.  I've had some success with the open source driver, but it is going to be a best effort driver and not perfect for everyone's setup.

An additional resource may be located here:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/RadeonDriver
« Last Edit: January 16, 2017, 10:33:11 AM by torreydale »
Want to thank me?  Click my [Thank] link.
 

ATI Radeon Xpress 200
« Reply #1 on: January 16, 2017, 09:10:37 AM »
 

bitsnpcs

  • Platinum Level Poster
  • **********
  • 3237
    Posts
  • Reputation: 305
    • View Profile
    • Try to Grow

  • Kernel: 4.x
Hello,
in Menu>Settings>Install Drivers>Additional Drivers
I have the following -

Unknown:Unknown
This device is not working

(the 2 options are)

Using processor microcode firmware for Intel CPUs from intel-microcode (proprietary)
 
Do not use the device (this is the one highlighted)

Video on YouTube plays correctly, fonts are blurry on the forum and desktop, display settings are at 1024x768, the other options are lower.
I want to use 1440x900 as it is correct one for this monitor.

I have tried selecting the proprietary driver, this does not alter the view, and the display resolution choices remain at 1024x768 maximum.

Is there a driver available that is not listed that would resolve this ?
« Last Edit: January 17, 2017, 06:26:10 PM by bitsnpcs »
 

 

-->
X Close Ad

Linux Lite 6.6 FINAL Released - Support for 22 Languages Added - See Release Announcement Section