Posts: 893
Threads: 197
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
0
As some of you may remember, I had some problems with LL hanging at boot up in Win8.1/LL2.8 i.e. with laptop1 in signature. This occurred either with a GPT formatted SSD (with UEFI) or an MSDOS (MBR) formatted SSD (without UEFI installed). I got the impression from someone on the forum that this problem didn't occur with a win7 or 10 dual-boot.
To test this I would therefore like to set up a win7/LL2.8 dual boot on an SSD. I have the win7 installation disk but are the updates still available? I ask this because the other day I tried a fresh install of win7 and was connected to the internet (300Mb/s) for several hours for initial updating & patching with little success - I thought updates were available until April 2019, as with LL2.8 ...
Mike
64bit OS (32-bit on
Samsung[i] netbook) installed in [i]Legacy mode on MBR-formatted SSDs (except
pi which uses a micro SDHC card):
2017 -
Raspberry pi 3B (4cores) ~
[email protected] -
LibreElec, used for upgrading our Samsung TV (excellent for the task)
2012 -
Lenovo G580 2689 (2cores; 4threads] ~
[email protected] -
LL3.8/Win8.1 dual-boot (LL working smoothly)
2011 -
Samsung NP-N145 Plus (1core; 2threads) ~ Intel Atom
[email protected] -
LL 3.8 32-bit (64-bit too 'laggy')
2008 -
Asus X71Q (2cores) ~ Intel
[email protected] -
LL4.6/Win8.1 dual-boot, LL works fine with kernel 4.15
2007 -
Dell Latitude D630 (2cores) ~ Intel
[email protected] -
LL4.6, works well with kernel 4.4; 4.15 doesn't work
(This post was last modified: 09-30-2016, 10:12 AM by
m654321.)
Posts: 1,542
Threads: 147
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation:
4
MS support promises are rarely understood correctly. Any extended support for Windows 7 past October of this year, will only be for long running Professional versions, however even there many applications in Windows 7 are doomed to obsolescence; that is very little patching and kernel hardening will be available, regardless of MS announcements, and when Windows 10 approaches a half billion by the end of the year, insider hints seem to be that resources dedicated to Windows 7 will not be much of a priority for MS, actually really can't be sensibly. The Windows 7 kernel is considerably more deprecated and top heavy than you may think, and the actual updates you may need are often long gone because the patches don't always connect sequentially, so new installs from old media will not always connect those convoluted dots. It's going to be pretty self deprecating and pretty rapidly so, and new installs from old media will be next to impossible to update. Many original Windows 7 Professional systems have exceeded 80gig over their years of usage, and to expect to update such absolutely top heavy systems from an old media install is to have very unrealistic expectations considering the way MS dirties its own systems. You really should install !0, for any extended use. Don't waste your time with 7. To fully update a new 7 install done from old removable media, even if it was possible, (and it's not) could take days.
TC
All opinions expressed and all advice given by Trinidad Cruz on this forum are his responsibility alone and do not necessarily reflect the views or methods of the developers of Linux Lite. He is a citizen of the United States where it is acceptable to occasionally be uninformed and inept as long as you pay your taxes.
Posts: 893
Threads: 197
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
0
Many thanks for your comments, TC.
Well, that's blown a hole in my idea for doing a win7/LL dual boot till the end of the decade.
However, I'm not tempted by the pricey alternative, i.e. to buy win10 Pro (£100 to £130). I wouldn't touch the cheaper win10 HE as it's not possible to manipulate the privacy settings as much.
Looks like it's going to be an LL single boot then, with win8.1 (already have install CD) as VM guest in LL host. Or alternatively, the other way round (LL as VM guest in win8.1 host), though that feels like heresy, as after two years I now feel like an LL afficionado!
I have to say, hand-on-heart, with laptop (1) in signature below, it's probably the most practical and time saving solution to have LL guest on win8.1 host (I have always had many more glitches with LL than with win8.1, which are consequently time-consuming to resolve). I think I'm going to provoke gasps of disbelief with what I've just said... aaaargh!
Mike
PS. Did I really say that..?
64bit OS (32-bit on
Samsung[i] netbook) installed in [i]Legacy mode on MBR-formatted SSDs (except
pi which uses a micro SDHC card):
2017 -
Raspberry pi 3B (4cores) ~
[email protected] -
LibreElec, used for upgrading our Samsung TV (excellent for the task)
2012 -
Lenovo G580 2689 (2cores; 4threads] ~
[email protected] -
LL3.8/Win8.1 dual-boot (LL working smoothly)
2011 -
Samsung NP-N145 Plus (1core; 2threads) ~ Intel Atom
[email protected] -
LL 3.8 32-bit (64-bit too 'laggy')
2008 -
Asus X71Q (2cores) ~ Intel
[email protected] -
LL4.6/Win8.1 dual-boot, LL works fine with kernel 4.15
2007 -
Dell Latitude D630 (2cores) ~ Intel
[email protected] -
LL4.6, works well with kernel 4.4; 4.15 doesn't work
(This post was last modified: 09-02-2016, 01:48 PM by
m654321.)
Posts: 1,542
Threads: 147
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation:
4
Hey Mike,
I'm not quite sure about what privacy differences you are referring to. You can certainly run Firefox as your default browser and Startpage as your browser homepage in windows 10 Home, and certainly proxy all you want. You can run Libreoffice for Windows as default office suite. You can easily separate Windows administration to homegroup, and leave other users without access. You can designate private network settings separate from public for safe networking. You can even run mesh and/or private ad hoc wifi with hostednetwork. There is no privacy from MS itself when you use any of their their products, but most other privacy things can be configured. Windows 7 is certainly more web vulnerable, and desktop vulnerable than Windows 10. You're a Linux user. You can get into any Windows file system you want, if the box is sitting in front of you and you have a live linux dvd, and know it or not the opposite is also true as well with certain live file managers in a base Windows rescue disk. All computers have accessible protocol accepting firmware, and disk formatted software. There is always a way in. There is no such thing as always private, just good security practices, delete key is not the same as mulit-pass zeroing, and excessively long mixed multi-character passphrases don't break in minutes on SBCs like you see in the movies, more like months and years even on supercomputers with DBs in the trillions and trillions, and in a ridiculous case like that it is actually possible to build a trojan into a passphrase and reverse the effect. MS is vulnerable across the board because they are proprietary, and refuse kernel access to their users.
TC
All opinions expressed and all advice given by Trinidad Cruz on this forum are his responsibility alone and do not necessarily reflect the views or methods of the developers of Linux Lite. He is a citizen of the United States where it is acceptable to occasionally be uninformed and inept as long as you pay your taxes.