| Poll: Linux Lite Future Naming / Numbering Scheme? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
| Letters - Linux Lite Citrine A, B, C, etc. (misko_2083) | 0 | 0% | |
| Roman Numerals - Linux Lite Citrine I, II, III, IV, etc. (misko_2083) | 9 | 56.25% | |
| Numbers (In Words) - Linux Lite Citrine One, Two, etc. (misko_2083) | 0 | 0% | |
| Binary - Linux Lite Citrine 1, 10, 11, 100, etc. (misko_2083) | 0 | 0% | |
| Colors - Linux Lite Citrine White (.2), Red (.4), Blue (.6), etc. (sysdrum) | 7 | 43.75% | |
| Current Number Scheme - No Change (Linux Lite Citrine 3.x) | 0 | 0% | |
| Total | 16 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
Linux Lite Release Roadmap
|
01-03-2015, 04:38 PM
(01-03-2015, 04:23 PM)colinkx250 link Wrote: I think the original numbering is much easier to understand and straight forward why waste time on gimmicks? Linux Lite is known for its great OS and the numbering system is part of this simple straight forward philosophy surely. +1 I agree colinkx250 the version numbering system currently used is exact. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
