12-04-2014, 10:59 AM
It seems to me, too, that there is little benefit to be gained in upgrading from 2.0 to 2.2. I can see the logic of issuing a new version, as there has been a lot of development since the LL2.0 ISO was published, but an up-to-date installation of 2.0 with additional packages installed (and unwanted ones uninstalled) appears to provide everything that most users would want from LL2.2.
To answer your question newtusmaximus, the backup facility in 2.2 is Deja Dup. I have to say, though, that I would recommend Back in Time rather than Deja Dup, having tested them both. It's perhaps not quite as simple, but it's not complex and it has the advantage of backing up in the native file format and it is faster (in restoring) and more flexible than Deja Dup. Incidentally, the Thunar right-click modification suggested at https://www.linuxliteos.com/forums/index...pic=1136.0 also works for Back in Time using the command: /usr/bin/backintime-gnome %F .
To answer your question newtusmaximus, the backup facility in 2.2 is Deja Dup. I have to say, though, that I would recommend Back in Time rather than Deja Dup, having tested them both. It's perhaps not quite as simple, but it's not complex and it has the advantage of backing up in the native file format and it is faster (in restoring) and more flexible than Deja Dup. Incidentally, the Thunar right-click modification suggested at https://www.linuxliteos.com/forums/index...pic=1136.0 also works for Back in Time using the command: /usr/bin/backintime-gnome %F .