Linux Lite A.I. Services are now live! https://www.linuxliteos.com/shop.html


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A message for MS: try 32-bit Linux Lite - still good...
#6
(12-25-2019, 07:07 PM)MS link Wrote: I mean, it looks similar, but it is just so much simpler in a good way. But maybe this is a shallow impression.
Either way, it seems to work flawlessly, as far as it goes in a VBox for now.

Like you, I personally, I prefer LL3.8 to series4, as it seems runs better on my older & lower-powered equipment, and of course you've got the 32-bit choice - e.g. significantly less RAM usage with LL3.8, lighter and more responsive to mouse clicks (significantly less lag).  I find it's simpler crisp appearance very attractive and prefer its default icon theme.  But I'm afraid it's the onward march of  'progress', with all distributions generally getting 'heavier' with each successive release ... 
64bit OS (32-bit on Samsung[i] netbook) installed in [i]Legacy mode on MBR-formatted SSDs (except pi which uses a micro SDHC card):
2017 - Raspberry pi 3B (4cores) ~ [email protected] - LibreElec, used for upgrading our Samsung TV (excellent for the task)  
2012 - Lenovo G580 2689 (2cores; 4threads] ~ [email protected] - LL3.8/Win8.1 dual-boot (LL working smoothly)
2011 - Samsung NP-N145 Plus (1core; 2threads) ~ Intel Atom [email protected] - LL 3.8 32-bit (64-bit too 'laggy')
2008 - Asus X71Q (2cores) ~ Intel [email protected] - LL4.6/Win8.1 dual-boot, LL works fine with kernel 4.15
2007 - Dell Latitude D630 (2cores) ~ Intel [email protected] - LL4.6, works well with kernel 4.4; 4.15 doesn't work
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: A message for MS: try 32-bit Linux Lite - still good... - by m654321 - 12-25-2019, 11:47 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)