"Linux Lite", a name of hubris?

[MS]

No[n]e of them are "the worse" for being Lite.

I believe you got that one a bit opaque way.

What I mean by what I mean, is that no other Linux distro actually is called simply Linux, if to take out what is considered a universal addon signifying certain changes to the mainstream, which in that case would be "Lite".

Now, since Linux - speaking of a product - does not exist, as we only have meta-Linux around or certain various interpretations of Linux, without any core pattern given from a place of authority, all my claims are abstract, notwithstanding, already said, it is about the name and what could trigger some people. The notion of "THE Linux", instead of "various Linuxes".