02-25-2018, 06:29 PM
(02-25-2018, 02:30 PM)Jerry link Wrote: [quote author=LL-user link=topic=5094.msg39368#msg39368 date=1519566803]
Suggestion: replace KeepassX by KeepassXC
Once I suggested replacing KeepassX by Keepass2 which I still mainly use (maybe more out of habit). But meanwhile I have also KeepassXC installed and use it, too.
Due to the character of Linux Lite to keep things simple & light I assume KeepassXC would be the better option. No mono and wine required. And nevertheless it offers auto-typing.
Thanks for your consideration
Keepassx (10) actually has less dependencies then Keepassxc (17). Keepassxc also requires a number of qt5 libs. Whats the difference in memory usage?
[/quote]
Does that dependency calculation include wine and mono?
memory usage:
via ps:
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
xx 5490 0.6 2.2 730928 92028 ? Sl 19:05 0:02 keepassxc
xx 8922 0.5 2.7 1275384 112024 ? Sl 10:59 2:44 /usr/bin/cli /usr/lib/keepass2/KeePass.exe
via Task Manager:
KeePass.exe 109MB
KeePassXC 92MB
KeePassXC starts a lot faster and is snappier. Also, KeePass2 crashes now and then and doesn't appear as native.
What I do miss in KeePassXC is (currently) the possibility to use the backup plugin respectively KeePass plugins in general.
Hope that helps
