![]() |
Lite Control Center - Suggestions welcomed - Printable Version +- Linux Lite Forums (https://www.linuxliteos.com/forums) +-- Forum: Development (https://www.linuxliteos.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Linux Lite Software Development (https://www.linuxliteos.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=30) +--- Thread: Lite Control Center - Suggestions welcomed (/showthread.php?tid=1976) |
Re: Lite Control Center - Suggestions welcomed - shaggytwodope - 07-13-2015 (07-13-2015, 01:04 AM)N4RPS link Wrote:Hello! The code being used to show the ip isn't taking ipv6 into consideration I think, needs to be looked into. Also, I think the screenshots of control center with ip's are bad. Even more so with ipv6... it can contain some nasty hardware info. Which can ofc be used against folks. Maybe some kind of psa for users needs to be in place... show some caution with sharing ip's. Re: Lite Control Center - Suggestions welcomed - shaggytwodope - 07-13-2015 (07-13-2015, 12:51 AM)N4RPS link Wrote:Hello! In thoery this shouldn't be to hard, most of the code parses everything in a somewhat modular way. But... ewww effort lol. Re: Lite Control Center - Suggestions welcomed - Valtam - 07-13-2015 Rob, what does: Code: ping6 ipv6.google.com return? Re: Lite Control Center - Suggestions welcomed - anon222 - 07-13-2015 (07-13-2015, 03:15 AM)shaggytwodope link Wrote:[quote author=N4RPS link=topic=2056.msg15464#msg15464 date=1436749442] The code being used to show the ip isn't taking ipv6 into consideration I think, needs to be looked into. Also, I think the screenshots of control center with ip's are bad. Even more so with ipv6... it can contain some nasty hardware info. Which can ofc be used against folks. Maybe some kind of psa for users needs to be in place... show some caution with sharing ip's. [/quote] I'm with you on this. It's kinda risky to use screenshot + ip's. What we need is just a status. "Active" when connected and "Not Connected". I just managed to fix all the issues with ip-adress information. ![]() But maybe we should remove them for user safety. If someone uses NAT in a Virtual machine this will print out the exact internet IP address of the computer. Not a good combination with screenshooter definitely. Re: Lite Control Center - Suggestions welcomed - shaggytwodope - 07-13-2015 (07-13-2015, 03:01 PM)misko_2083 link Wrote:[quote author=shaggytwodope link=topic=2056.msg15472#msg15472 date=1436757316] The code being used to show the ip isn't taking ipv6 into consideration I think, needs to be looked into. Also, I think the screenshots of control center with ip's are bad. Even more so with ipv6... it can contain some nasty hardware info. Which can ofc be used against folks. Maybe some kind of psa for users needs to be in place... show some caution with sharing ip's. [/quote] I'm with you on this. It's kinda risky to use screenshot + ip's. What we need is just a status. "Active" when connected and "Not Connected". I just managed to fix all the issues with ip-adress information. ![]() But maybe we should remove them for user safety. If someone uses NAT in a Virtual machine this will print out the exact internet IP address of the computer. Not a good combination with screenshooter definitely. [/quote] Actually, what might be worth considering in the future is a click to reveal type thing. There is a bit of css already to expand content. Damned if I remember what line tho lol. So that the element with the ip is only shown when clicked, and the status is default. How to do this escapes me atm, but worth doing in the todo list. Re: Lite Control Center - Suggestions welcomed - anon222 - 07-13-2015 (07-13-2015, 06:51 PM)shaggytwodope link Wrote:Actually, what might be worth considering in the future is a click to reveal type thing. There is a bit of css already to expand content. Damned if I remember what line tho lol. So that the element with the ip is only shown when clicked, and the status is default. How to do this escapes me atm, but worth doing in the todo list.Wonderfull idea shaggytwo. Frontend will handle that with just a few lines of css. I'll add the button to Toogle the appearance of IP's. Also clicking the button will hide the screenshot icon while the IP's are shown. Two flies with one shot. ![]() I might add some warning also. Just to be sure. ----------------------------------------------------------- edit ----------------------------------------------------------- Here it is: ![]() Clicking on the button displays IPs and hides the Screeenshot ![]() Re: Lite Control Center - Suggestions welcomed - anon222 - 07-13-2015 Another way to do it: ![]() Let me know what you think which way is better. Re: Lite Control Center - Suggestions welcomed - torreydale - 07-13-2015 I like the second way. The one without the warning. Re: Lite Control Center - Suggestions welcomed - shaggytwodope - 07-14-2015 (07-13-2015, 08:52 PM)misko_2083 link Wrote:[quote author=shaggytwodope link=topic=2056.msg15490#msg15490 date=1436813506]Wonderfull idea shaggytwo. Frontend will handle that with just a few lines of css. I'll add the button to Toogle the appearance of IP's. Also clicking the button will hide the screenshot icon while the IP's are shown. Two flies with one shot. ![]() I might add some warning also. Just to be sure. ----------------------------------------------------------- edit ----------------------------------------------------------- Here it is: ![]() Clicking on the button displays IPs and hides the Screeenshot ![]() [/quote] I like this method, Not sure about the wording of the warning. I'd hit up Jerry on that, it's what hes good at lol. As for hiding the screenshot Icon, spot on idea. Two birds with one stone indeed. But come to think of it, it may be hard for some users to then use it to send in info for one reason or another. Re: Lite Control Center - Suggestions welcomed - avj - 07-14-2015 Just a thought here but why not just show which interface(s) is/are active instead of ip addresses? |