I'm about to install Wine from the LL 1.0.8 64 bit disco to run an old Windows 95 32bit application (that I've been running under Windows 98 and then XP OK)

Reading WineHQ FAQ at http://wiki.winehq.org/FAQ#head-0bae04b4...acb6f367ff

Quote:7.2. How do I create a 32 bit wineprefix on a 64 bit system?

At present there are some significant bugs that prevent many 32 bit applications from working in a 64 bit wineprefix. To work around this, you can create a new 32 bit wineprefix using the WINEARCH environment variable. In a terminal, type:

So does LL 1.0.8 come with the 32bit or the 64bit Wine and is this 7.2 of the FAQ still relevant? Which Wine is recommended for my situation?

(I have 2 other Windows programs I need to install: one 32bit written for XP and the other a 16 bit for Windows 3.11 WfG that has continued to work under 98 and XP.)

Just installed Linux Lite and now noticed I spelled my name wrong when defining the user!! Is there an easy way to correct this? I've been through all the Settings and User Manager options but couldn't see anywhere to do this.

Note: I'm referring to user's full name, not the log-on ID

I contacted Joey-Elijah Sneddon of OMG! Ubuntu! for a request to a write-up of Linux Lite. At 2:08 PM (14:08) U.S Central Standard Time, he emailed me back saying he'd take a look at it.

Here is a screenshot of the e-mail. E-mail is blurred out for integrity and privacy of his and my information.

How do you install unixodbc? apt-get install unixodbc doesn't seem to work.

Hi
I'm trying to install LL onto a new clean PC with EFI but with my own partitioning scheme. I first set the EFI to remove Secure Boot. Then booted with the Live CD and then ran GParted to format the HD as per:



I then ran the installation and selected Something Else. Now I'm stuck as I expected (hoped!) that I could select the appropriate partitions, in particular the root to install, the swap, and efi for the boot loader (if I understand that correctly)



Any help appreciated as I'm trying to get off XP

I escaped three years ago from my employer's forced use of XP and its MS predecessors and have been using Mac OS for the past 9 years at home. I tried Lubuntu for a few weeks in January before finding Linux Lite. I disagree with the writers of these below articles. I do not think they are aware of Linux Lite.

"Lubuntu might be the best Linux distro for Windows XP users" http://www.itworld.com/open-source/40900...s-xp-users
"Windows XP User? Here’s 4 Reasons to Switch to Lubuntu This April" http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2014/02/four-...this-april

Hopefully more XP users will find Linux Lite.

Hi,  should I be able to play video just with LL's default drivers?  I understood this to be yes from somewhere.  :-\  So far can't get nvidia driver to install and can't play videos from either DVD --- VLC freezes at opening still and has to be killed--- or any webpage video.  If I'm reading the xorg log correct, system runs through various drivers and settles on vesa.  Doesn't seem to find a nouveau module which i've read somewhere is the alternative to nvidia?

Nothing I've tried so far successfully installs the nvidia driver.  Not install drivers, or marking directly in synaptic or manually downloading from nvidia.  According to Nvidia, install needs to be done outside the X desktop, so I've tried various suggestions more or less versions of this method:

Download shell script: 'NVIDIA-Linux-x86-96.43.18-pkg1.run' for my NVIDIA Geforce4 MX440SE graphics card.  Save to 'Downloads' folder. In terminal:

$ sudo gedit /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf

Add 5 blacklist lines for: vga16fb, nouveau, rivafb, nvidiafb, rivatv. [just following orders here but assume its to stop conflicts].

$ sudo apt-get remove --purge nvidia*    Been doing this a lot!  Reboot to a terminal with ctl+alt+F1

$ sudo service lightdm stop     then cd to downloads folder.

$ chmod +x NVIDIA-Linux-x86-96.43.18-pkg1.run
$ sudo ./NVIDIA-Linux-x86-96.43.18-pkg1.run

Install aborts with maybe useful warning? :  "Kernel header file /lib/modules/3.8.0-34-generic/build/include/linux/version.h doesn't exist"

Checked what did exist ...  /lib/modules/3.8.0-34-generic/  has shortcut or symbolic link to...  /usr/src/linux-headers-3.8.0-34-generic/include/linux/  and no file 'version.h'  So path expected by the .run file doesn't exist.  If this missing file is causing all the other aborts, then any help gladly taken.

Running Linux Lite 1.0.8 and this card is not recognized by the system.

So far I have done the following:

In a terminal:
[table]
[tr]
[td]sudo leafpad /etc/modprobe.d/ath9k.conf
[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]

Then a file called ath9k.conf opened, and I input the following:
[table]
[tr]
[td]options ath9k nohwcrypt=1
[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
Saved this file.

Then in terminal:
[table]
[tr]
[td]lsmod |grep ath9k[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]

Performed a reboot. No effect.

Next, I input the following in a terminal:
[table]
[tr]
[td]sudo apt-get install rfkill[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]

I believe this finished installing, apparently no effect.

This is a little event we do on the LDC forums, so we spread the love to this forum! Post away! Screenshots have to be strictly Linux Lite.

Hi,

I just recently installed Linux Lite on my old Dell GX260.  I was having trouble with bootup, but did the "nomodeset" workaround to get going and it worked fine.  It boots up and I have access and can use everything, but the resolution is only 640x480 and there is no option to improve it.  I tried to used the driver installer from the Intel site, but I get an "Error: Dependency is not satisfyable - libglib 2.0-0 (>=2.37.3)"

Is there a way to increase the resolution or an avenue someone can suggest for fixing the issue?

Thanks,
Chris