Right this instant for fun I'm running LL 3.6 beta live 64bit in gnome-boxes on Ubuntu LTS. Runs very fast no lags. Hope this kind of success continues. Nice for testing. Amazing to me.
Note* To get it to run in boxes from Ubuntu you first have to select boxes as the default application to open it with in nautilus. Then the ISO will load without complaint under NEW in boxes. The speed is unbelievable.
-Computer-
Processor : 2x Intel® Core™2 Duo CPU T7700 @ 2.40GHz
Memory : 2048MB (942MB used)
Operating System : Linux Lite 3.6
User Name : linux (Live session user)
Date/Time : Wed 09 Aug 2017 01:36:00 PM CDT
-Display-
Resolution : 1024x768 pixels
OpenGL Renderer : Gallium 0.4 on llvmpipe (LLVM 4.0, 128 bits)
X11 Vendor : The X.Org Foundation
-Multimedia-
Audio Adapter : ICH - Intel 82801AA-ICH
-Input Devices-
Power Button
AT Translated Set 2 keyboard
VirtualPS/2 VMware VMMouse
VirtualPS/2 VMware VMMouse
QEMU QEMU USB Tablet
QEMU QEMU USB Mouse
QEMU QEMU USB Keyboard
-Printers-
No printers found
-SCSI Disks-
ATA QEMU HARDDISK
QEMU QEMU DVD-ROM
TC
Hi everyone: I'm relatively new to Linux Lite, but what I'm experiencing has me completely baffled. We recently got set up with a POS software program (run via a web site) that allows us to process credit cards. I had an old HP pc laying around, and thought this would be a perfect use for it, as it would only be used for this sole purpose. I installed the OS, loaded up the web site in Firefox, and when I get to the point to submit the transaction for processing, the web server responds with an error. It's not a standard error or a browser error - it's an error generated by the POS web server stating it cannot process the transaction, and it instructs me to refresh the browser. I do that, and it's an endless circle.
I tried the POS web service with Firefox, Chromium and Google Chrome, and all three refused to process the transaction. For grins, I tried processing on my Windows PC using Google Chrome, and it went through without an issue.
What am I missing here? A web browser is a web browser ... what would make this work on a Windows browser, but not work on a Linux browser? I'm totally at a loss ......
Thanks for any light you can shed on the subject!
-M
hello
i have been using Linix lt. on two of my pc s i have a HP laptop that came with wds 7 so its the newest i have and a desk top with amedia center case and i think its from about 2000 but both run linx lt w/o any real problems . however i have an very old wnd xp desktop that i was able to install Kali linux and it does run and no real issuses but for a secerity reason i cant get chrome or firefox to install or iether run and iceweasle has no flash or shockwave. so it sucks for media. the real problem is will not boot from jump drive beacse of bios has not that option and cd will not run iether. i have tryd plop rufus ubootinet i do have iso on dis k and in floder i do have a floppy drive but i cant find a floppy around here threw them all out go figure. i got go now thanks forgive errors pls
My wife had been complaining about how slow Firefox was on her Lenovo laptop. I had experienced the same problem on my Lenovo and had made the switch to SeaMonkey. Yesterday I finally took the time to check her laptop out. It wasn't just slow. It was excruciatingly slow. Moving the mouse cursor over an item took 2 - 3 seconds for it to highlight, then took another 2 - 3 seconds to respond after clicking. Loading web pages was also unbearably slow. So I went ahead and installed SeaMonkey. Guys, it was the difference between night and day. I can't fully explain just how much faster SeaMonkey is on that laptop. I'm not promoting SeaMonkey here. I'm trying to point out that there is some problem with Firefox. I don't know if it's something that is only apparent with Lenovo laptops, certain video cards, just the configuration of my Lenovos, or what. What I can say is that if you are running Firefox and it seems slow to you, you might want to consider installing a different web browser. If you happen to really Firefox, but think it's too slow, you can install SeaMonkey, then add the Sea Fox extension and the Classic Firefox Theme For SeaMonkey extension and you'll end up with basically Firefox. No, there are a few differences, but basic layout and functions are close to the same.
Hi Guys,
I am running the old 2.4 with a lot of tweaks, redecoration & etc, rather old one but works fine for me
One moment I've recently found out - I can not switch users, got black screen instead.
(right from the beginning it was configured for autologin)
So I've digged a bit:
lightdm --test-mode --debug
the same black screen.
/usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm-greeter-session /usr/bin/lightdm-webkit-greeter
same-same
ok, clean 2.4 inside VM on lightdm-webkit-greeter shows the login page.
My system
(lightdm-webkit-greeter:4935): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.40.2/./gobject/gsignal.c:2462: signal 'show-error' is invalid for instance '0xed3970' of type 'LightDMGreeter'
(lightdm-webkit-greeter:4935): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.40.2/./gobject/gsignal.c:2462: signal 'timed-login' is invalid for instance '0xed3970' of type 'LightDMGreeter'
(lightdm-webkit-greeter:4935): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.40.2/./gobject/gsignal.c:2462: signal 'quit' is invalid for instance '0xed3970' of type 'LightDMGreeter'No idea when it happened for the first time, this has been migrated a lot between different hardwares.
Is there any way to debug that lightdm-webkit-greeter?
I can try the lightdm-dtk-greeter instead but it is not LL styled
PS
i7-2600, Intell DH67BL, on-board video, SSD
Updates fail with the following error. Terminal will not launch, so none of the fixes or diagnostic in the forum can be done.
What can I do?
===========================
Install Updates Error log
===========================
Install Updates could not successfully download and install available updates.
Go to https://www.linuxliteos.com/forums/ and paste the log below into a new or existing thread for assistance.
============ Log ===========
E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'sudo dpkg --configure -a' to correct the problem.
Some nice new machines.......All Linux.
https://stationx.rocks/
They're at it again...unbelievable!
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2017/08/fix-g...tory-error
On an old Asus X71Q (setup3 in sig), which comes with 2 separate physical drives, I would like to dual-boot LL with Windows OS, but not in the conventional way.
In the past, I have dual-booted LL & Win7 on one physical drive (/dev/sda), and linked them to the 2nd physical drive (/dev/sdb), the latter used as a data-only partition. However, this time I would like to install Win7 on the 1st drive and LL on the 2nd, and link both OSes to an external USB drive which I'll use as the data partition.
Before I start, I just want to check if there is anything I should do a bit differently for this less conventional way of dual-booting ... ?
Many thanks as always, for your help
Mike