General > On Topic

Importance of the Individuals in the Forum upon Distro choice

(1/3) > >>

Kalifornia:
I agree with the OP 100%. LL is my daily driver on my work lappy for a couple weeks now. Fast and reliable and with good people to turn to when you figure out how noob you are at Linux ;) The LL community does not have that elitist Linux attitude I've witnessed and read about.

NRD80V:
Dear Dave
Good comment.

1) Responding Linux Forums are of two types - Upcoming and Fanatics
For instance in Sabayon if you post some thing which may hurt the developers, they would pounce on you with angry replies
Linux Lite being an upcoming distribution, there is a lot of energy and enthusiasm
Hope that this stays long.

2) User Friendly Linux Distributions are of two types - Enterprise Use and Windows Replacement
Enterprise Oriented Linux are difficult to customise and use, example CENT-OS, Fedora, Open-Suse and Mageia
Windows Replacement again can be sub-divided into two categories - Linux-Windows and Windows Replacement
Zorin for an instance is a Linux-Windows. They have tweaked it too heavily to make it look and feel like Windows 7
The result the OS has lost its capacity of being a Linux Distribution
Linux Lite is a Windows Replacement and not Linux-Windows and hence it is better and usable

Advantages of Linux Lite:
a) Functional Stability
b) Support & Long Life Cycle
c) Highly Binary Oriented
d) Compatible with all hardwares and windows

Disadvantages are:
a) Ubuntu Orientation, this has many implications which we can't predict.
One of the issue is Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Kernel is really not Long Term Kernel, many scholars are writing nastily about this

b) Applications in the repo are at-least 3 to 5 versions down the current. Example VirtualBox is 4.3.10 when now 4.3.18 is active

But from an end user point of view, the advantages certainly out weights the disadvantages
Hence this is a Good Linux Distribution for all

Yours
VN


--- Quote from: Wirezfree on November 07, 2014, 12:56:58 PM ---ChrisL put it really well.

I started out with Windows 2.1 and have used all the variants.(Good & Bad)
But I stuck with XP till the bitter end until a few months back.

My experience kind of mirrors ChrisL, so I wont repeat blow for blow.
other than to say I tried a lot a lot of distro's early this year,
and also sampled their respective Forums(Good & Bad experiences)..!!
I did stick on Zorin8 for a month or so, it was very good, but just did not quite feel right.

Then I found Linux Lite which was also very, very good,
I posted a few questions... got excellent help, and as they say... "The rest is history"
It was the Forum that swung it for me, along with the pro-active Dev's..
I now have LL2.0 on 2 PC's & Laptop all networked & sharing.

Dave

--- End quote ---

Wirezfree:
ChrisL put it really well.

I started out with Windows 2.1 and have used all the variants.(Good & Bad)
But I stuck with XP till the bitter end until a few months back.

My experience kind of mirrors ChrisL, so I wont repeat blow for blow.
other than to say I tried a lot a lot of distro's early this year,
and also sampled their respective Forums(Good & Bad experiences)..!!
I did stick on Zorin8 for a month or so, it was very good, but just did not quite feel right.

Then I found Linux Lite which was also very, very good,
I posted a few questions... got excellent help, and as they say... "The rest is history"
It was the Forum that swung it for me, along with the pro-active Dev's..
I now have LL2.0 on 2 PC's & Laptop all networked & sharing.

Dave

NRD80V:
Hi
A Nice Attempt to try some good alternatives.

Kindly stay with One Linux for at least 1 year, then only you would be really knowing how to use the OS effectively
If you hop consistently from one OS to another, you would never get satisfied and also it results wastage of time and energy

On the Debian Gene, all Debian Distros are aimed to replace Windows Operating System and if possible Mac OS
Therefore all Debian Distributions are easy to use and are also highly compatible with Windows
Further these are also Resource Friendly.

Comparing Ubuntu, I found that Linux Lite and Linux Mint are performing better.
Choose XFCE Desktop for it is highly resource friendly and is easier to customise than Gnome or KDE or LXDE or MATE.
Unity is a very awkward Desktop Environment and hence I never touch Ubuntu once they moved out of Gnome 2.

Your Choice of selecting Linux Lite is really good and it would reward you if you stick to this for a fair amount of time

The RPM Gene is mainly aimed at Enterprise Usage and hence are a bit difficult to use
Fedora, CENT-OS, Mageia, PCLinux OS and Open-Suse are some good RPM Distros to try
However, if you are a New Linux User, then I would suggest you not to go for these

Linux Mint and Linux Lite are better choice than these RPM Distros for they are much simpler to use

Hope I added some information which is useful to you

Yours
VN 

rokytnji:
Howdy and Welcome.

Choice always depends on what gear I am installing to and what I wish to accomplish.
I run a Slackware based netbook. <runs fast, runs good>
I run Puppy based old Panasonic toughbook and Amrel Toughbook. <both are old by todays standards>
Also a Debian based netbook. <runs fast, runs good>
Sigh, NT based laptop for tuning motorcycles. <drm software>

But a computer is just a tool/wrench for me. Something I use to accomplish something.
Linux-Lite XFCE worked the touchscreen on this Dell out of the box before I bought a hard drive for it.
So being a strong, capable netbook. It was a no brainer for me.

Anyways. Choice is good. You know. America used to have hundreds of motorcycle brands back in the early 1900's.
Now there are only a few. The world is a poorer place with that lack of choice.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page