12-27-2018, 06:59 PM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specters_of_Marx
Derrida had the new internationalism and its unavoidably infectious hypocrisy pegged. New names same oppressors. Making money is in its least ethical spectre in international business. Imperialism was more essentially ethical. Of course in a genuine assessment communism was even less ethical than capitalism. Linux doesn't have a lot to do with international business and political ethics. It once aspired to a kind of lame geekdom of anarchy, but gave itself much too much credit as an influence. Capitalism is not an idealism, rather in fact, it is natural enough to be named an inherent quality of human reason... but of course any ethical aspirations that could be acquired by it are dependent on that same humanity... which we seem to be in the process of redefining in this age.
TCÂ
Derrida had the new internationalism and its unavoidably infectious hypocrisy pegged. New names same oppressors. Making money is in its least ethical spectre in international business. Imperialism was more essentially ethical. Of course in a genuine assessment communism was even less ethical than capitalism. Linux doesn't have a lot to do with international business and political ethics. It once aspired to a kind of lame geekdom of anarchy, but gave itself much too much credit as an influence. Capitalism is not an idealism, rather in fact, it is natural enough to be named an inherent quality of human reason... but of course any ethical aspirations that could be acquired by it are dependent on that same humanity... which we seem to be in the process of redefining in this age.
TCÂ
I read quite a few years ago that Capitalism has a tendancy to self destruct and just cannot be substained indefinately.But, even is a system in place is perfect on paper. even the best ones will fail eventually because is is run by humans.Be it, power, greed, control, etc. there will always be people willing to step on other people's head because they think they deserve more.