It looks like it's installed on a 50-core Supercomputer with 5000 terrabyes of RAM!
(04-24-2018, 08:40 AM)RandomBoy link Wrote: [ -> ]It looks like it's installed on a 50-core Supercomputer with 5000 terrabyes of RAM!
Lol. Specs are on YouTube
Jerry, are you saying speed/response on like for like computer has improved over LL 3.8 64bit - With what RAM & CPU?
[size=1em][member=149]newtusmaximus[/member][/size]
Quote:[size=1em]With what RAM & CPU?[/size]
Here's the YouTube video link Code:
youtu.be/m-aynCFVvOE
[size=1em]Memory: 8073MB (611MB used)[/size]
[size=1em]Resolution: 1920x1080 pixels[/size]
[size=1em]Video: 4th Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller[/size]
[size=1em]SSD: OCZ-VERTEX 60Gb[/size]
Wowza!
I wonder how much of this speed is due to the SSD. :-O
Also, is this video made just after a reboot / bleachbit cleaned config?
Don't want the cache/swap misleading this performance... or use of steroids.
Cheers!
The test pc is a mix of old and new hardware. A modest, dual core cpu, a 1st gen - 7 year old SSD.
But 16 GB RAM is the clincher surely?
(04-25-2018, 08:37 AM)newtusmaximus link Wrote: [ -> ]But 16 GB RAM is the clincher surely?
Does it actually make any difference? LL3.8 never seems to use anywhere near one-eighth that amount of RAM. Maybe I'm missing something?? Having said that, my Lenevo with 8GB RAM is very nippy, but so is my eeePC901 with 1GB RAM.
Well said [member=296]justme2[/member] Can't we just focus on the fact that we didn't get any fatter. Surely the glass is half full here?