This is great folks
There are no privacy issues here. Every section was gone over and tested thoroughly before we launched this as a public beta.
I'll see what I can do about the ram thing. This has been the most challenging software to date. The more we add to it, the more it costs and we have to draw the line at some point for cost vs time spent.
We're unlikely to fine tune this beyond what it already does. The beta test focuses on app bugs in all areas of the code.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
CPU will display the current clock speed at the time of processing. I'll look into whether inxi can show the actual chip speed.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Whomever submitted this entry:
Linux Lite 2.x Series: User Submitted on 02/12/2016 09:45
Code:
Machine:
System: ��������������������������������� product: ��������������������������������� version: ���������������������������������
Mobo: Intel model: NUC5i5RYB version: H40999-503
Bios: Intel version: RYBDWi35.86A.0246.2015.0309.1355 date: 03/09/2015
Could you please let me know. Thank you.
(02-12-2016, 05:27 PM)Jerry link Wrote: [ -> ]This is great folks There are no privacy issues here. Every section was gone over and tested thoroughly before we launched this as a public beta.
I'll see what I can do about the ram thing. This has been the most challenging software to date. The more we add to it, the more it costs and we have to draw the line at some point for cost vs time spent.
We're unlikely to fine tune this beyond what it already does. The beta test focuses on app bugs in all areas of the code.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Jerry, wouldn't Conky be a simple solution to that issue ?(memory display) Some customizations would be required (how/where to display)but this issue would be resolved.
It's not that simple sorry. It would require a complete rewrite of most of the code. Memory is only available in recent versions of inxi. The extra cost here is the other consideration for this.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
And uploaded both 64 and 32 bit...
Upgraded 3 pc's to 2.8, and then added info for:
N2807(Barebones Micro PC), E3845(Barebones Micro PC) and i54200U(HP TS14 Lappy)
This is great! We have an amazing community here
Software on both sides seems to be doing its job.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Uploaded data for two 'low spec' machines, both of which run LL2.8 very successfully.
1: ASUS eeePC 901 running LL on a 32GB class 10 SDHC card
2: ASUS eeePC 701SD running LL on 8GB SSD with 16GB SDHC for data storage.
There must be thousands of these models lying dormant which can be given new life. They were originally sold with a version of linux (can't remember which), a very poor and unreliable build due to the fact that the update method quickly filled the SSD and the PC became unusable. That does not happen with LinuxLite.